Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Regulation

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

In 2002, the U.S. National Policy regarding the use and trade of alcohol, tobacco, firearms and explosives was adopted. The policy in question shed a lot of light on the subject matter, drawing a very distinct line between the accepted actions and the ones that will trigger legal repercussions. Therefore, its adoption can be viewed as a major foot forward in the development of the national policies (Krouse, 2012).

The fact that the issues under analysis were finally handled by a single legal body clearly is one of the advantages of the policy mentioned above. As a result of the specified innovation, a more timely and efficient response to the related concerns can be expected. Moreover, the bureau should be credited for managing the issues related to drugs, firearms and explosives on a nationwide level as well as on the international one, therefore, tracking down the sources of drug peddling and firearms trade successfully (Ritter, 2015).

Unfortunately, the policy also has several flaws. The lack of connection between the cause of the problem and its outcomes can be viewed as the primary one; while RATFE allows addressing the concerns related to illegal tobacco, alcohol, firearms and explosives use, it fails to eliminate the social, political, and economic factors that cause the specified issues in the first place (Phillips et al., 2015).

Maintaining Advantages and Eliminating Disadvantages

The introduction of the latest technological advances into the framework of RATFE operations will enhance the timeliness and efficacy of its responses to the instances of illegal usage of the above-mentioned substances and items. Therefore, it is crucial that RATFE could be provided with the tools that will allow for the reinforcement of the policy and a careful and accurate information acquisition, interpretation, and transfer.

The disadvantages listed above can be managed with the help of amendments to the current regulation. Particularly, RATFE may need to consider the possibility of analyzing the issues that lead to the increase in alcohol- and drug-related crimes; particularly, the socioeconomic factors will have to be investigated. Indeed, recent studies show that drug peddling, alcohol abuse, and exceeding the limits of self-defense, as well as other crimes that are related to the current gun control policies. It should be noted, though, that the introduction of the RATFE members to new roles and responsibilities will require carrying out extensive training so that the board could be able to conduct the necessary assessments of the existing risks in an appropriate manner and respond to the emerging threats in a timely fashion.

Scholarly Support

How the Articles Support the Analysis

The papers used in the course of research provide sufficient evidence for proving the points raised above. These studies inform the evaluation of the policy under analysis by providing relevant information concerning its implications. In other words, the resources allow identifying the positive and negative outcomes of the policy applied to practical dilemmas.

Why the Articles Are Deemed as Credible

The papers can be considered valid, as they have been published in peer-reviewed journals and on the U.S. government sites and are comparatively recent. Hence, the sources are quite trustworthy and, therefore, reliable. Providing enough information for the evaluation, these papers serve as a strong foundation for the analysis to be based on.

Reference List

Krouse, W. J. (2012). The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF): Budget and operations for FY2011. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Web.

Phillips, C. D., Nwaiwu, O., Lin, S.-h., Edwards, R., Imanpour, S., & Ohsfeldt, R. (2015). Concealed handgun licensing and crime in four states. Journal of Criminology, 2015(803742), 18. Web.

Ritter, N. (2015). . Web.

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!