Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
There exist multiple moral philosophies, but some of the most well-known ones are Kants deontological moral philosophy and Mills utilitarianism. In this paper, both theories are explained. After that, it is argued that although Kants philosophy is better in some respects, Mills moral theory is preferable due to being practically applicable.
Kants ethical philosophy is a deontological one, meaning that it is based on absolute principles rather than on conditional rules. Kants categorical imperative is a principle that, according to his philosophy, applies to any rational being purely because of their being rational (Johnson and Cureton). In fact, any actions that are immoral are also irrational, for they contravene the categorical imperative (Johnson and Cureton).
One of the three (supposedly) equivalent formulations of the categorical imperative is that one must act only according to a maxim that can be simultaneously willed by one to become a universal law (qtd. in Johnson and Cureton). The categorical imperative should be distinguished from hypothetical imperatives, which exist because apart from rationality, other factors may motivate people; in this case, willing should be distinguishing from simply wanting , because the former means consciously committing to a goal, not only desiring it (Johnson and Cureton).
Another important notion in Kants philosophy is that of duty. Roughly speaking, duty is a motivation to act in a certain way out of respect for the code requiring one to act so (Johnson and Cureton). Nevertheless, actual adopted codes or laws may also be morally wrong, as in the case with Nazi German laws; thus, duty should be understood as complying with moral laws (which are dependent upon rationality) rather simply with some legislation (Johnson and Cureton).
In contrast, Mills moral philosophy is utilitarian: it primarily assesses actions as moral or immoral based on their consequences. The philosopher states that the main principle of morals is the principle of greatest happiness, according to which actions are moral or right in proportion to the degree of happiness they lead to and are wrong or immoral in proportion to the degree of unhappiness they cause (Mill).
Here, happiness should be comprehended as pleasure and the lack of pain, whereas unhappiness means deprivation of pleasure and the presence of pain (Mill). This understanding of happiness may appear simplistic; nevertheless, it is argued that this is not so, for Mill qualitatively differentiates types of pleasure, stating that there are higher and lower pleasures (Brink). For instance, intellectual pleasures are stated to be higher than bodily ones (Brink). Thus, although it is difficult to define in general which pleasures are higher and which are lower (Mill does so by using a notion of the preferences of a competent judge ; Brink par. 38), this moral philosophy is more complicated than simple hedonism.
When choosing a moral philosophy, one may be tempted to choose Kants system. His moral theory is more general and more sophisticated than Mills; it is easy to see how one could simplify Mills understanding of pleasure and simply turn his philosophy into pure hedonism, which could be harmful. Simultaneously, Kants categorical imperative appears to be more difficult to misinterpret, given that one is sufficiently rational.
Nevertheless, Kants theory may often not work in practice, for it often faces at least one major restriction: humans are not omnipotent. Given several bad choices and no good ones, one cannot decide between them based on Kants philosophy because one cannot make a good choice. To give an extreme but simple example, one may have to press a button and kill a thousand people today, or not press a button, and a million will absolutely certainly die three days later. In this case, Kants moral philosophy does not provide a solution, whereas Mills theory does. Thus, Mills theory is preferable because it is more applicable in practice.
Thus, Kants moral philosophy is rooted in the categorical imperative and on (Kants understanding of) rationality itself. In contrast, Mills moral theory is based on the principle of greatest happiness. While Kants theory is more elegant and sophisticated, Mills theory is preferable due to being much more practically applicable.
Works Cited
Brink, David. Mills Moral and Political Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2014. Web.
Johnson, Robert, and Adam Cureton. Kants Moral Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2016. Web.
Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism. Chapter 2: What Utilitarianism Is. Utilitarianism Resources, 1863. Web.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.