The Diligent: A Voyage Through the Worlds of the Slave Trade by Robert Harms

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

The issue of the slave trade is one of the most controversial ones because this question is not only associated with the problem of slavery, but it is also based on the problem of morality which is related to the discussion of slaves as objects of trade. In his book The Diligent: A Voyage through the Worlds of the Slave Trade, Robert Harms presents the records of Robert Durand who was the first lieutenant of The Diligent, the French slaving ship.

The French people joined the Atlantic slave trade later than the other European countries such as Britain and Portugal, but the French successes were significant, and the slave trade became the characteristic feature Frances development in the 18^th century. Thus, the historic significance of the book is in the fact that it provides the discussion of the role of slave trade in France during the 18^th century.

However, it is more important to concentrate on the aspect of morality to understand the French publics attitude to the problem of slavery in the 18^th century. Robert Durand does not demonstrate any signs of uncertainty in relation to the morality of the slave trade, and his position corresponds with the position of the French people regarding the nature of the slave trade, but it is possible to condemn Durand for his attitude because reflecting the publics visions, he violates the universe moral norms and supports cruelty and violence.

Robert Durands accounts show that the lieutenant does not feel any qualms about the idea of the slave trade in spite of its brutal nature. According to Harms, Durand was writing about selling people exactly as he would have written about selling barrels of wine or loads of wheat.

He gave no indication that he felt any sense of shame or moral ambivalence about his mission¹. Durands businesslike and matter-of-fact tone can surprise not only the author who analyzes the accounts but also the readers because this tone is not appropriate to discuss the important moral issue of the slave trade in France of the 18^th century².

Furthermore, the young lieutenant does not demonstrate the unique attitude to the problem. Instead, Durands accounts represent the attitudes of the majority in relation to the issue of the slave trade because the French public paid more attention to the problems of war, to the issue of famine, and to the economic questions associated with inflation and taxes than to such moral issues as the slave trade in the 18^th century.

In his work, Harms intends to explain Durands position while stating that the talk focused on issues of access, profits, tariffs, and bonuses³. Thus, Durands approach to discussing the question was typical for the period, and it was even the part of a general mind-set in the seaports of early eighteenth-century Brittany⁴.

From this perspective, it is almost impossible to state clearly whether the French public supported or not the idea of the slave trade because the actual public discussion of the problem was not observed within different social classes.

However, the reference to the social tendencies cannot be used to justify the approach of Durand to discussing the problem of the slave trade. The fact that Durand focused more on recording the factual details of the trade operations and prices and on counting the profits supports the idea that the aspects of morality were widely violated in the French society.

It is possible to condemn Durand for his actions because his activities are significantly associated with a lot of moral aspects, and Durand could reject the development of the slave trade as any other person in the French society. Nevertheless, many people chose to ignore the issue of the slave trade, and they discussed it only from the perspective of its profitability rather than morality. Slave traders chose their path consciously because the business was risky and problematic.

That is why, Durand made his choice without thinking about the moral implications of his actions. In spite of the fact that Durand was one of many people who did not focus on the slave trade as the social problem, this fact cannot be referred to while discussing the problem of condemning Durands actions. The slave trade was the business characterized by a lot of problems and contradictions associated with the concepts of the slaves freedom and use of their work in France.

The records and accounts written by Robert Durand demonstrate his focus on the slave trade as on the profitable business rather than on the moral issue. This approach or attitude is also reflected in the general publics visions of the question which were typical for the French society in the 18^th century.

However, in spite of the fact that the moral aspect of the slave trade was not actively discussed in the society, Durands attitudes and actions cannot be justified because the man violated simple moral norms and promoted the brutal practice of trading people. Thus, the book by Robert Harms is the important source to research the problem of the slave trade in France as the moral issue with references to the historic significance of the phenomenon.

Bibliography

Harms, Robert. The Diligent: A Voyage Through the Worlds of the Slave Trade. USA: Basic Books, 2002.

Footnotes

¹ Robert Harms, The Diligent: A Voyage Through the Worlds of the Slave Trade (USA: Basic Books, 2002), 5.

² Ibid., 5.

³ Ibid., 5.

⁴ Ibid., 5.

Click Here To Order Now!

The Diligent: A Voyage Through the Worlds of the Slave Trade by Robert Harms

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)