Literature Studies of the Book Author by Donald E. Pease

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

During a long period of time the meaning of the word author has changed considerably, and nowadays, it becomes a bit hard to distinguish what makes a good and worthwhile author, why so many critics still debate concerning the idea of authorship, and where is the line that distinguishes whether an author is dead or alive.

The world changes day by day, peoples preferences are under certain change as well, and, as a result, all the concepts, developed by people in this constantly changing world, do not remain the same. Donald E. Pease, the PhD from the University, makes a wonderful attempt to analyze what the peculiarities of a good author are, what makes an author alive or dead, and why it is so hard to define author purpose, taking into account that this term may apply to several different activities at one and the same time.

Donald E. Peases Author is a wonderful essay, where he argues about the ideas of authorship and the authors duties during different centuries, and also criticizes and evaluates the ideas by Barthes and Foucault.

I agree that the evaluation of the term author and the definition of authority may raise lots of questions: death of the authors happens when they disappear from culture, this is why the authors are not the only major constituents in texts and culture, and the readers and their comprehension of the texts become another crucial point in the discussions concerning the matter of authorship.

In his essay, Donald E. Pease pays much attention to the work by Barthes and his ideas as for the authors death and its importance to the text. Of course, authors death is not a concrete event; when the authors life is ended, however, it underlines one point concerning the absence of authors influence on the text and this texts interpretation by the reader. Barthes mentions that the author is dead, the text he thereby produces is not without an author (Pease, 112).

According to such kind of interpretation, the Barthes supports the authors separation from the text in the way that such separation promotes critique free from the authors point of view. On the one hand, without an author, the reader does not even get a chance to evaluate some piece of writing; however, on the other hand, without the reader, the work, created by the author, does not make sense without proper readers evaluation.

A discursive game always arriving at the limits of its own rule, without any author other than the reader&, who is defined as an effect of the writing game he activates (Pease, 112). Each line in the text is a kind of reflection that has to be evaluated, and the authors death is the only condition under which the work may be considered as worthwhile.

So, the work by Bathes, Donald E. Pease chose for analysis, serves as a proper proof that authors death in any piece of writing, differentiation of cultural and social issue, and readers participation are integral parts, which promote the creation of a masterpiece.

However, one year later, another significant piece of work appeared and offered one more standpoint where the role and the interpretation of the term author are presented. Donald E. Pease analyzes the work by Michel Foucault called What Is an Author.

This work introduces the evaluation of the cultural function of the author (Pease, 113). Within one year only, the idea as for the role of the author in texts interpretation has been changed considerably: another, more powerful meaning appears and impresses everyone with its content and certain concentration on authors role.

The author is finally neither an individual existing apart from a discursive practice, nor a subject acting within any specific practice, but what might be called a subjecting function (Pease, 113). According to this writer, the authors function in the text is not the most significant and not the only one, however, it has a certain impact and may serve as a kind of anchor in order to start interpreting the text.

In order to prove that Bathes ideas are not quite correct, Foucault offers proof by contradictions and evaluates what could happen if the role of authors in a culture turned out to be insignificant and they actually disappeared from texts.

According to Foucault, even the authors name is considered to be significant just because it is supported by the discourses in references to rights, obligations, and duties (Pease, 113). This is why if the author was not identified, the huge part of evaluation would be lost, and the interpretation, made by the reader, would not incomplete.

To my mind, Pease decision to compare two different ideas as for the authors role in the texts interpretation and possible death of the author is great indeed. This analysis helps to find out that the author still plays a significant function in culture. Baths offer quite a radical approach to the decision of the problem as for the authors complete disappearance in the texts interpretation. Foucaults fundamental idea that the author cannot be disregarded deserves attention as well.

This is why it is not enough to make a thorough description of these two approaches, and Pease evaluates their ideas and promotes the reader with a chance to interpret the content independently. Donald Pease demonstrates a good example of how it is possible to be a dead author while interpreting the text, and, at the same time, become a crucial part of the piece of writing that unites two different ideas.

In general, the role of the author in text and its interpretation by the reader takes a very important place in culture and literature in particular. The concept of an authors death should be regarded as a pure literal ethical notion that cannot be determined word for word. To comprehend the role of the author, it is first of all necessary to realize whether the author is dead or alive in the text. Authors presence allows identifying the status of the work and its connection to the other spheres of life.

The reader should get a chance to evaluate the content of the text, taking into consideration the surroundings, but still, be independent and use their own ideas and potential. And even if, according to Bathes, the author should be dead, his/her role in the text remains considerable, according to Foucault.

And Donald E. Pease demonstrates the best qualities of a professional writer, who cares about readers participation in the text, about readers abilities to find out new information, and, finally, about the neutral position that promotes readers growth and self-improvement.

Works Cited

Pease, Donald, E. Author. Critical Terms for Literary Study by Lentricchia, Frank & McLaughlin, Thomas. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.

Click Here To Order Now!

Literature Studies of the Book Author by Donald E. Pease

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)