The Troxel v. Granville Case Analysis

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

Petitioners Troxel filed a plea to see their late sons daughters. The mother of the daughters and respondent Granville objected to the Troxels request for a certain amount of visitation but did not reject all visits. Granville contested the Superior Courts decision to grant her greater visitation than she had requested. The paternal grandparents presented the petition for visitation of the granddaughters. Although the mother agreed to some time, she declined the proposed longer visitation. The mother filed an appeal alleging that the courts visitation order was illegal. Granvilles fundamental constitutional right to decide how to raise her daughters was not in any way protected by the courts assumption that it is typically in the childrens best interests to spend time with the grandparents.

Therefore, the lower court issued a visitation order allowing two grandparents to see their grandchildren. In this case, the mothers fundamental right to make choices about the care, custody, and control of her two daughters was violated by the visitation order. The Washington Superior Court did not assess the mothers suitability as the custodial parent any significant weight. The Supreme Court ruled that a state court cannot award someone visiting privileges even when doing so would be in the childs best interests if the parent of the child opposes them because doing so would violate the parents fundamental liberty interest in raising the child.

There is an assumption that good parents operate in their childrens best interests. As long as the parent is healthy, there is typically no cause for the State to intrude into the familys privacy and cast doubt on that parents capacity to make the most excellent choices for the upbringing of that child. The trial court did not give Granvilles assessment of what was in her daughters best interests any extra weight. Instead, the court gave her the burden of proving that visitation would not be in her daughters best interests. The court must present the parents judgment with at least some extra weight. Finally, the Court ruled that the Act was unconstitutional because it was too broad, allowing anybody to request visitation at any time, and because it did not consider the presumption that a fit parent would act in the childs best interests.

Reference

Justia Law. Web.

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

Posted in Law