As this project is a continuation of a paper the writer U358999 wrote and becaus

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

As this project is a continuation of a paper the writer U358999 wrote and becaus

As this project is a continuation of a paper the writer U358999 wrote and because the initial papers will have to be consulted in the writing of the present one, I would like for them to please be the writer assigned to this paper. The writer I have requested, who should be a quebec lawyer or law student as i have stated in my initial order, did the introductory parts of this paper for me. The instructions for the most recent part of paper are shown below: Detailed plan (30%): On the basis of the description of the project, previously submitted to the professor, this work presents the structure envisaged for the final work. It contains : – An introduction and a conclusion, both written. – A coherent structure for the final work. – Short, clear, concise, precise and quality titles for the parts, sub-parts and, if applicable, where applicable, sub-subparts of the work. – The objective sought for each part, sub-part and, if applicable, sub-sub-part – A transition paragraph between each part and sub-part, allowing understand the narrative framework and ensure the coherent progression of the argument (1 to 2 sentences). – Relevant references to support these ideas. The references are identified following a search on the databases available through the UQAM (sofia) library. They are all cited in footnotes and in accordance with the Canadian Legal Reference Manual (McGill Guide – available online)! Please bring more sources in addition to the ones cited in the description please. these sources must be relevant to the topic and indigenous law. – A projection of the number of words for each part, sub-part and, if applicable, sub-sub-part of the final work. Submission terms: Work of 6 pages maximum. Work, typed and paginated, in Word format. Font: Times New Roman 12 point typeface; Line spacing 1.5; All margins at 2.5 cm; Footnotes consistent with the McGill Guide. This class is an class on Quebec indigenous law and the paper needs to be consistent with it. The sources must be cited in conformity with the McGill Guide “The Canadian Guide to Uniform Legal Citation”. As the writer knows, the initial theme chosen was decolonization. I have shared class lectures and readings, the paper must be consistent with them and align with them. this paper is meant to be written within the scope of those sources shared.
This “detailed plan” the writer wrote me got me a mark of 60% (i provided the writer all instructions and materials necessary). that assignment was supposed to be a detailed plan for my final paper. my teacher responded to that assignment and gave me points i need to improve for the final paper, which is what i am ordering today. I am attaching the teacher’s evaluation and really want to it to be made clear to the writer that the notes my teacher has given MUST be looked at and the paper MUST be changed accordingly, or my mark will likely be similar to the one i got for the detailed plan. the detailed plan was worth 30% and this final paper is worth 50%, so its really important to me to do well, especially considering i need to boost my mark to not risk failing (a fail is a 59% in my school). So please, before starting to write the final paper, consult my teacher’s notes and make the proper changes to the detailed plan. this will help complete the paper more efficiently and will make you able to actually use an outline to write the final paper, as the original detailed outline written is not useable.
The instructions for the final paper are as follows: Research work: 50%
This research work focuses on a specific theme (decolonization) that raises a question
new and of interest to you. This question is within the scope of the course (refer to powerpoints and readings- extremely important!). Work consists of a concise and precise answer to the question asked (no vague sources or citations, please be precise with examples). The work produced is 6500 words (+or-10%), including footnotes.
The work contains:
– A presentation page
– A table of contents
– An introduction. This aims to present the theme of the research and its context, the question that the development will answer, the type of sources consulted for answer the question, the limits of the research carried out as well as an announcement of plan.
– Development. This consists of a structured and coherent response to the question asked in the introduction. It is structured in 2 or 3 parts which are themselves
structured into sub-parts.
– A conclusion which summarizes your reflection by presenting avenues for reflection or solution and an opening.
– Throughout the work, ideas are supported by references, legal and scientists. Relevant documentary references from Indigenous Nations can also be used. All references used to support the argument appears in footnotes, in accordance with the method of citation of the Canadian Legal Reference Manual (McGill Guide).
submission terms:
Typewritten and paginated text on 8.5 x 11″ paper
Font: Times New Roman 12 point typeface;
Line spacing 1.5;
All margins at 2.5 cm;
Quotations of more than 4 lines, single spaced and outside the body of the text;
Footnotes consistent with the McGill Guide (please make sure to be consistent with it, the guide is available online).
My teacher has provided these 2 sources to help in writing the final paper (let me know if you have any trouble finding them):
– Jocelyn Létourneau, Le coffre à outils du chercheur débutant, Montréal, Boréal, 2006
– Gagner du temps et réaliser de meilleurs travaux | Infosphère | UQAM – https://infosphere.uqam.ca/
Class readings (must be consulted – all should be available online, please do not hesitate to notify me if you cant find one or can only find in french, i will provide you with a document):
– Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, Honor the truth, reconcile for the future, Summary of the final report, 2015, p. 1-25 + calls to action (justice).
https://theconversation.com/peut- on-decoloniser-le-canada-106889
– Marie-Andrée Gill, L’histoire crochie, Balado « Réconciliation », 25 minutes, en ligne : Réconciliation (radio-canada.ca)
Acte pour amender et refondre les lois concernant les Sauvages, (1876), Chap. 18 (Extrait).
– Loi sur les Indiens, L.R.C. (1985), ch. I-5 (Extrait).
– Pierrot Ross Tremblay et Nawel Hamidi, « L’épreuve de la vérité : le Canada, les Premiers Peuples et l’esprit de 1867 » (2018) 319 Liberté 11 (3 p)
– Kahnawá:ke Membership Law, (2007), K.R.L. c. M-1 (Extrait). Loi sur les Indiens, L.R.C. (1985), ch. I-5 (Extrait).
– Marie-Andrée Gill, Le terme « Réserve », 2020, 26 min., en ligne : Réserve (radio-canada.ca)
– La complexité et les difficultés d’être chef d’une communauté autochtone, reportage, 2020, en ligne : https://ici.radio-
canada.ca/espaces-
autochtones/1489120/real-mckenzie-jean-
charles-pietacho-chef-autochtone
Loi constitutionnelle de 1982 (Partie II), en ligne : https://laws-
lois.justice.gc.ca/fra/Const/page-16.html#h-52
– R. c. Van der Peet [1996] 2 RCS 507 [Extraits, 28 p.]
– Nation Tsilhqot’in c. Colombie-Britannique, [2014] 2 R.C.S. 256, para 24-88.
– Aimée Craft, « Living Treaties, Breathing Research » (2014) 26(1) Canadian Journal of Women & the Law, 2-22. https://muse-jhu-edu.proxy.bibliotheques.uqam.ca/article/543906
– R. c. Sioui, [1990] 1 RCS 1025, p. 1043-1061 (Extrait)
-Martin Papillon et Audrey Lord. « Les traités modernes : vers une nouvelle relation ? » dans Stéphan Gervais, Martin Papillon et Alain Beaulieu. Les Autochtones et le Québec : Des premiers contact au Plan Nord, Presses de l’Université de Montréal, 2013
– https://petapan.ca
– Nation Haïda c. Colombie-Britannique (Ministre des Forêts), [2004] 3 R.C.S. 511 [21 p.].
– Loiselle-Boudreau, J. (2009). L’obligation de consulter les peuples autochtones : le cas du projet de mine de niobium à Oka. Recherches amérindiennes au Québec, 39 (1-2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.7202/045006ar
– Première nation de Betsiamites c. Canada (Procureur général) [2005] (C.S. Qué.).
-Geneviève Motard et Mathieu-Joffre Lainé, «Prendre le droit autochtone au sérieux : Entretien avec Hadley Friedland» (2016) 40(2) Anthropologie et Sociétés aux pp. 195–207.
– John Borrows, La constitution autochtone du Canada, Québec, Presses de l’Université du Québec, 2020, p. 41-97.
-Anne Lévesque, Sarah Clarke et Cindy Blackstock, « La plainte de discrimination devant le Tribunal canadien des droits de la personne portant sur les services d’aide à l’enfance aux enfants des Premières Nations et le principe de Jordan » (2016) 25 Enfances Familles Générations aux pp.
1-16.
– Loi C-92 concernant les enfants, les jeunes et les familles des Premières Nations, des Inuits et des Métis, en ligne :
https://parl.ca/DocumentViewer/fr/42-1/projetloi/C-92/sanction-royal
– Déclaration des Nations Unies sur les droits des peuples autochtones, Rés AG, Doc off AG NU, 61e sess, Doc NU A/RES/61/295 (2007).
– Marie Léger, « L’histoire de la Déclaration des Nations Unies sur les droits des peuples autochtones » (2007) XXXVII Recherches amérindiennes au Québec aux pp. 145-155.
– Loi sur la Déclaration des Nations Unies sur les droits des peuples autochtones,L.C. 2021, ch. 14.
Comments from Customer
Additionnal comments on the detailed plan provided by my teacher:
-Review the layout of the bibliography
-Justify the text.
-We do not understand the problem, therefore the resulting plan seems very vague. Where are the parts and subparts? It would be necessary to rework the framing, the problematization, to ensure that the different parties echo it. The conclusion remains extremely general, and also needs to be reworked in depth.

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!