Law and Internet in Canada

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

The new internet law that has been passed by the Canadian Government has evoked numerous reactions from the civilians. For the new laws have subjected the residential users of internet a maximum of 25 GB, which makes internet usage limited for them.

Actually there is uproar over this matter with many Canadians who often use appliances such as Skype phones and accounts, which are extensively used for web surfing, sharing of music and video streaming. Uproar has also been heard from civilians who are fond of downloading playing games and music as well as from the young civilians who have got to shop online.

This would also adversely affect the power users, for instance those who use multiple computers and smart phones. Therefore, this new law may become an inhibiting factor to the real internet users [residential users] (Gingras 31).

This by extension has brought fourth complaints by the residential users. Actually the bottom line, being that there will be no more unlimited buffet, for the TekSavvy users, who had prior bought the high speed premium of internet plan at $31.95 are currently subjected to get 175MB less than what they were offered before.

This implies as earlier put that more people will stream on Netflix than to be subjected to this loss if they have to subscribe to premium channels (Brett 35).

This law in view, will serve both the corporations and the residential internet consumers, however the highest beneficiary will be the corporations as most of the time, they use the data from google search which may ultimately not require high capacities relatively to the residential users, who may often need to get music, graphical data, download movies, perhaps watch games (Parry 69).

In this view, the new laws will have a lesser negative impact on the cooperations than that which it would have on residential users (Hopkins 35).

This law was not created to create a monopoly, however in the long run that may be so. This is in regard to the restrictions of the 25 GB subjected to the residential consumers. This implies that although the CRTC gave a number of these ISPs a 15% discount, TekSavvy asked for fifty percent.

It implies that their will still be, some real adjustments for consumers. In simpler words, their may have been competitive threats particularly from independent ISPs which certainly are tailored for the residential users who have diverse internet usage other than just Google search (Schwabach 49).

This intervention is at all not accepted by civilians, as it is restrictive. A good number of internet users in Canada are up in arms over the new law.

I have captured the views of David Bradbury, a Canadian civilian who was furious and was on the verge of writing a complaint letter to his MP. He says;

I wrote a letter to my MP and mailed it off this morning. I was going to

email it, but thought it would carry more weight as a printed piece. I am a

TekSavvy customer and my monthly data transfer is moving from 200 GB

to 25 GB. An 88% drop in service, but without a corresponding 88% drop

in the cost of the service. This law may not benefit the intentions of all the parties, in fact it may corrupt the corporations (Black 15).

There might be some political interference though not in its explicit manner. May be a number of high ranking officials may have been involved for selfish gains. I am not convinced that bribery was involved. The persons benefiting the most here are the corporations and not the civilians (Syanteston 21).

The world trade may play a part in terms of online trade, which at most times involves Google, reknown a corporation. However this world trade play may not directly be involved in legislations that affect Canadian residential internet users (Campbell 21).

I would be skeptical on the influence of world cup, however its coincidence that this occurs when world cup is to be hosted. The relation may be of minimal significance as per now, for their is still much time before world cup is hosted (Quinto 52).

Its important to note that this new law may have a direct economic influence. When these laws are put on board, it may make more residential users to get discouraged to use the internet, and this may lower the productivity in home based work that is done online.

It also inhibits information spread, and information is vital in any developed economy. In essence, I would propose that the Government of Canada needs to pilot such laws before making it a binding a public policy, so as to curb any looming economic challenges and/or downfall (George & Matsuura 11).

Works Cited

Black, Sharon. Telecommunications law in the Internet age. New York: Morgan Kaufmann, 2002. Print.

Brett, Trout. Internet Laws affecting your company. New York: Virtual bookworm publishing, 2005. Print.

Campbell, Dennis. Laws and Regulatory Regimes. New York: Lulu com Publishers, 2007. Print.

George, Delta & Jeffrey Matsuura. Law of the Internet. Chicago: Aspen Publishers Online, 2002. Print.

Gingras, Hopkins. Laws of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2007. Print.

Hopkins, Bruce. The nonprofits guide to Internet communications. New York: Bruce R. Hopkins publishers, 2002. Print.

Parry, Aftab. Internet law and the three Ps. Mexico: Law Journal Seminars publishers, 2000. Print.

Quinto, David. Law of Internet disputes. London: Aspen Publishers online, 2001. Print.

Schwabach, Aaron. Internet and the law technology. Chicago: ABC-CLIO Publishers, 2006. Print.

Syanteston, Dan. Private international law and the internet. London: Kluwer law international Publishers, 2007. Print.

Click Here To Order Now!

Law and Internet in Canada

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)