Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
The issues of understanding the structure of society, its drivers, and attempts to predict its behavior occupy many researchers. To explain complex phenomena, scientists propose theories based on their observations and research. This paper studies and compares two papers discussing different theories and ideas. Devine (2015) considers the concept of ideological social identity (ISI) developed within the framework of Social Identity Theory (SIT) and symbolic ideology research. Sidanius and Pratto (2011), in turn, describe the social domination theory (SDT) that they developed. Although approaches are significantly different, they can both be used to understand human behavior and society.
The sources studied have different goals and features, which affect their perception. Devines (2015) article presents the results of a survey experiment where the researcher tested hypotheses about ISI and its influence on an individuals political behavior. The source includes a data collection and analysis description, demonstrating the investigators findings. The article contributes significantly to the research literature on ideologies, their influence on humans, behavior, and political decisions. The chapter presented by Sidanius and Pratto (2011) describes SDT, its features, origins, essential propositions, and application. It includes a description of the theorys development process and its provisions from the authors personal experiences and other theoretical perspectives. The source introduces SDT and is educational, presenting a generalized picture of the results of long years of work and research.
The ideas presented in the considered sources differ but aim to study society. In particular, Devine (2015) draws attention to the fact that traditionally the research of ideologies and their influence on people raises many complex concepts unrelated to the actual situation. In fact, people identify themselves and their ideological views according to the groups to which they belong. Moreover, adherence to a particular perspective may also be based on opposition to another group. As a result, ideological identifications occur in accordance with the individuals social group, even if personal political views may differ. The studied concept of ISI represents a psychological attachment to a group with a specific ideology. Research data analysis proved that ISI is common in American society and impacts political choice. The study demonstrates societys power to influence individuals actions and decisions.
The SDT, presented in another source, also pays significant attention to groups and ideologies. Sidanius and Pratto (2011) believe that minority dominant groups often shape society through prejudice and oppression. Examples of pressure by dominant groups include sexism, racism, and nationalism. There are social institutions and ideologies in society that can maintain existing hierarchies or reduce their influence. One of the theorists came to this conclusion when he encountered racism supported by law enforcement agencies (Sidanius & Pratto, 2011). A critical concept of the theory is social domination orientation (SDO), which reflects a desire to sustain existing group inequalities. Dominant groups use ideologies, also called legitimizing myths, such as common stereotypes or values, in their favor. Power, that is, the ability of groups to use resources to their advantage, distinguishes dominant and marginalized groups, but it can also be used to achieve equality. Consequently, SDT offers an image of the world by studying existing group hierarchies.
Thus, the sources under consideration the research paper and the educational chapter consider different perspectives for understanding human society. Although papers choose different approaches and present distinct concepts and theories, they also have common features. In particular, both pay attention not to individual prospects but to the influence of groups. Sources also demonstrate the impact of ideologies and beliefs on peoples behavior. They will help study the structure of society, the behavior of the population, and similar social and political issues.
References
Devine, C. J. (2015). Ideological social identity: Psychological attachment to ideological in-groups as a political phenomenon and a behavioral influence. Political Behavior, 37(3), 509-535.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2011). Social dominance theory. In L. P. A. M. Van, A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 418-438). SAGE Publications.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.