Exegesis of Job 23: 1-17, The Book of Job

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Introduction

The Book of Job can be considered as one of the most philosophical works of the Old Testament. The uniqueness of the Book of Job is in its depth and thoroughness in dealing with the relationship of human suffering to divine justice (Gaebelein, 1979-1992, 843). The commonly accepted notion that good doing is rewarded, while evil-doing is punished, is challenged, changing the nature of knowledge about God and human suffering. Such shift can be specifically attributed to the paradox of Gods presence, i.e. explaining the suffering as the absence of Gods justice and at the same time Gods presence is the cause of much suffering, where Jobs sufferings are the heavy hand of God on him (Thomason, 1997, 57). The latter can be evident in the third cycle of the dialogue dispute between Job and his friends. In that regard, this paper attempts to construe Jobs reply to Eliphaz in Job 23:1-17, stating that despite Jobs righteousness, his limited knowledge and his human perspective, he had faith that righteousness will be rewarded after all. Accordingly, the lack of understanding of the notion of submission and Gods presence caused some doubts in his mind that he overcame, which explains the differences in Jobss image in the prologue, the epilogue and discussion parts.

Exegesis

Acceptance and submission

The chapter 23 serves as Jobs reply to Eliphazs questions in the previous chapter, which represent the limited knowledge of humans on Gods purpose. Eliphaz questions the righteousness of Job, Is it for your piety that he reproves you, and enters into judgment with you? (Job 22:4 NRS). The following assumptions of Jobs sins, demonstrate the presumptive and arrogant claim to knowledge of Gods ways (Gaebelein, 1979-1992, 860). Jobs reply is also a demonstration of a humans perspective, providing his own definition of submission to Gods will, i.e. not departing from the Þ´æ°Õ¸Ô (Strongs 4687: commandment; law; ordinance). Jobs perception of submission can be seen in the way he characterizes his attitude toward Gods words, æ¸ä·ß (Strongs 4687), treasuring up and saving them (Job 23:12 NRS). It can be understood that Jobs arguments, from the Hebrew word ê¼Õ¹Û·×·ê (Strongs number 8433b: in this context and considering the context, rebuke can be used rather than argument), are mainly concerned with Job following the commandment. However, elements are differing from Gods perspective on submission, and which Job, even following Gods words did not comprehend. One of such elements is the fact of Job lifting his voice in protest (Bartlett and Taylor, 2009, 148). The latter can be seen in the usage of such words as Þ°è´Ù (Strongs number 4805: rebellious), and Ð²à¸×¸Ô (Strongs number 0585: expressing grief or physical distress), referring to the feeling that overwhelms Job. Specifically, the usage of the word Þ°è´Ù (4805) can be outlined, where the translation as rebellion is not a coincidence, considering the usage of the Hebrew term in conjunction with the word è·â (Strongs number 07451b: evil, harm, calamity, trouble); Evil people seek only rebellion, but a cruel messenger will be sent against them (Pro 17:11 NRS).

Rebellion (Þ°è´Ù), in regards of submission and acceptance, can be seen in the definitions of rebellion in the books of Samuel and Ezekiel, For rebellion is no less a sin than divination, and stubbornness is like iniquity and idolatry (1Sa 15:23 NRS); do not be rebellious like that rebellious house; open your mouth and eat what I give you (Eze 2:8 NRS). Although such departure in the character of Job at the beginning of the book and latter passages, from being presented as a saint of God who will not curse God and die to having complaints that are bitter to the point of being shocking (Gaebelein, 1979-1992, 845), there is a unity in terms of the fear of injustice, referred by Ginsberg as being peculiar to Jews (Pope, 1974, XLII). Although such assertion might be mitigated, the Hebrew word Ñä¼·×·Ó (Strongs number 6343: dread, and the corresponding derived verb 6342) can be found nine times in the Book of Job. Nevertheless, with the fear and obedience, Job lacked an important element, demonstrated in his reply to Eliphaz, i.e. having rebellious complaints, with the root word of the latter, i.e. Þ¸è¸Ô (Strongs number 4784: being rebellious, disobedient, refractory), being conditioned with the fear of God; If you will fear the LORD and serve him and heed his voice and not rebel against the commandment of the LORD&, it will be well (1Sa 12:14 NRS). Nevertheless, it should be stated that the problem of Job is not in Gods attributes, rather with another significant element in the book, i.e. questioning the presence-absence of God.

The absence of God

It can be seen from Jobs response to Eliphaz that Gods absence is an essential factor in such reply (Bartlett and Taylor, 2009, 151). On the one hand, Job feels Gods hands through his sufferings, while on the other hand, Job states, If I go forward, he is not there; or backward, I cannot perceive him (Job 23:8 NRS). In the following verse, Job continues, on the left he hides, and I cannot behold him; I turn to the right, but I cannot see him (Job 23:9 NRS). In those two verses the main emphasis can be understood through the usage of the words perceive, behold and see (Job 23:8-9 NRS), i.e. Ñ¼´Ùß (Strongs number 0995), ×¸Ö¸Ô (Strongs number 2372), and è¸Ð¸Ô (Strongs number 7200) respectively. It can be seen that in addition to the physical sight of the justice of God, for Job, the conclusion about Gods absence is largely based on his disability to understand and comprehend. The latter show, to an extent, that Job follows the logic of his friends, i.e. it is impossible that he should suffer so and not have done wrong, so he does not see God as he is pious and so does not deserve the punishment he is receiving (Dunn and Rogerson, 2003, 339).

Such blindness in Jobs case, i.e. the incapability of understanding Gods purpose is driven by the limitedness of human perspective. In that regard, such limited perspective is only from Jobs side, where Job acknowledges despite not seeing Him, God knows the way Job takes (Job 23:10 NRS). In that regard, it can be stated that comprehension of God in Jobs reply is twofold, where on the one hand, he complains of his sufferings, not seeing God, and on the other, he acknowledges that this is a test. The latter can be seen through the verse when he has tested me, I shall come out like gold (Job 23:10 NRS). The Hebrew term Ñ¼¸×·ß (Strongs number 0975: to examine, to prove), implies examining the nature of the person, wherein the Old Testament is used in conjunction with such words as test my heart and mind (Psa 26:2 NRS) and test me and know my thoughts (Psa 139:23 NRS). In both cases, it can be implied that such test investigates whether the person is worthy. Accordingly, the same term can be used when testing gold, which was used in the verse as a figure of speech, meaning that Job will prove worthy of the test. Such confidence contradicts the beginning of the chapter, in which Job is desperate in his sufferings, which might assume that Job has doubts in his righteousness. In that regard, it can be said that the verses in which Job confirms his obedience to God might be addressed to himself as well, specifically considering his fear of God and his limited knowledge, he does not Gods purposes, and thus, meeting God does not know the outcome of such meeting (Thomason, 1997, 57). Such statement opposes the view that God vindicating Job over his friends is a suggestion that questioning the relationship with God in an angry manner is better than to accept stock answers as the friends have done (Dunn and Rogerson, 2003, 339). It was a purpose of God to test Job, whose heart was made soft, to give him knowledge that could not understand at the time, Therefore I have uttered what I did not understand, things too wonderful for me, which I did not know (Job 42:3 NRS).

Conclusion

It can be concluded that human limited knowledge might change their perception of the way right and evil are reattributed, which is seen through the example of Job. The pace of the Book of Job has coincided with the doubts that might have across Jobs heart. The Book of Job has a purpose that cannot be reduced to a simple statement (Gaebelein, 1979-1992, 858), where the tests that Job was put into was to strengthen his faith, through removing the doubts caused by his limited understanding of Gods presence and what the submission to God is, and when his rebellious attitudes dissolve, and resentment disappears, he came to accept God on Gods terms (Gaebelein, 1979-1992, 860). Such a point of spiritual maturity would not have been achieved without the sufferings that Job has gone through removing his doubts.

References

Bartlett, David Lyon, and Barbara Brown Taylor, eds. 2009. Feasting on the Word Year B : Preaching the Revised Common Lectionary. 1st ed. Vol. 4. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.

Dunn, James D. G., and J. W. Rogerson. 2003. Eerdmans commentary on the Bible. Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans.

Gaebelein, Frank E., ed. 1979-1992. The Expositors Bible Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House.

Pope, Marvin H. 1974. Job in the Anchor Bible. New York: Doubleday & Company Inc.

Thomason, Bill. 1997. God on Trial: The Book of Job and Human Suffering. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.

Click Here To Order Now!

Exegesis of Job 23: 1-17, The Book of Job

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)