Sociological Line in Marie de Frances Story

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

Introduction
Main body
Conclusion
References

Introduction

The Lees of Marie de France is a series of twelve short narratives about the Breton barks of the poet Marie de France. They were probably created in the late 12th century. The short, narrative poems emphasize the glorification of the notion of courtly love by the adventures of their protagonists (Sell, 2021). Although the original text was composed in French, it was later translated into Anglo-Saxon by monks. Some additions and changes may have been made in the translation process. Little is known of Maries life; there is evidence that she was interested in ancient folk tales of various genres and ancient legends of miracles, using their plots for her works (Sell, 2021). Lee, which tells of the werewolf Bisclavret with the vivid flavor of a traditional Breton tale, may have been one of these stories. Through the storyline of the lycanthrope Bisclavret and his unfaithful wife, this narrative conveys the essence of excluding external things from societies. The main character in the narrative is a noble baron from Brittany named Bisclauret, who would hide in the woods every week for three days, with no one knowing where he was going. The Barons wife was overcome by curiosity about these disappearances. She began to beg her husband to tell her where he was going and what he was doing (Burgess, 2018). Bisclavret admitted that he was a werewolf and went hunting in the woods in the guise of a wolf, leaving his clothes on the edge of the forest. Without these clothes, he could not regain his human form. Bisclavrets wife was unfaithful to him and had a secret lover a local knight. Having grasped the mystery, they followed the Baron into the forest. When Bisclavret threw off his clothes and took the form of a wolf, they picked up the scattered pieces of his clothing and returned with them to the castle. The unfaithful wife announced to everyone that the Baron must have been killed; after that, she and her lover were married and took possession of Bisclavrets lands.

Main body

From the first part of the story, one can learn how the people of that world fended off an unnatural, non-human being. There are several meanings to the act of the wife and her lover, one of which is to deny and exclude the hostile act, namely adultery. The wife would not have to justify her infidelity and incur societys censure by getting rid of her husband (Sell, 2021). Moreover, it would be much easier for society to accept the Barons death than accept this familys adultery. This is the exclusion of specific negative emotions that are not convenient to society. One could say that the wifes main motive was to get rid of negative and unacceptable emotions by getting rid of her husband. An additional motivation for the wifes act can undoubtedly be considered excluding those middle things from society animals, plants, monsters, and fairy tale characters. Her husband was just one of those, and the first thing that came to her mind after his secret was revealed was the need to get rid of him. Such exclusion could be considered natural suspicion and peoples aversion to things they do not understand (Sell, 2021). In this context, one can also draw a parallel with todays actual society. People do similar things they shut themselves off from things that confuse them.

Returning to the story, sometime later, the king and his retinue were hunting in the woods, and the hounds managed to chase a wolf. Recognizing the monarch by sight, Bisclavret, the wolf, ran up to grab hold of his stirrup and kiss his feet to the amazement of all present (Burgess, 2018). The king called off his hounds and took the wolf with him to the palace as a pet. The wolf proved to be so gentle in temper and kind that it became everyones pet. However, when the knight who had married his wife showed up at court, Bisclavret attacked him. A wise nobleman declared that such an action was quite out of character for the beast and that the knight had somehow provoked him. Soon after, the king paid a visit to Bisclavrets wife, who greeted him warmly, but the wolf, who had been with the king, attacked the woman and bit off her nose (Burgess, 2018). This aroused new suspicions, and the king ordered the knight and his wife to be interrogated. The woman immediately confessed to everything and showed Bisclavrets clothes. Then Bisclavret assumed his human form again. The monarch restored him to his lands and banished the traitorous knight and unfaithful wife.

In the second part of the story, one can already observe a different attitude regarding external culture acceptance. Bisclavret was allowed to get good treatment at court and was respected. At the same time, Bisclavret was listened to, as in the case of the knight and his wife, despite his distinct appearance. However, the exclusion of certain negative emotions was not overshadowed. There is another telling moment in this part of the piece: the expulsion of the knight and his wife. Both of them were banished for being unfaithful to the Baron (Sell, 2021). This can also be seen in the context of dealing with certain negative phenomena, such as betrayal. Society is still fending them off, but now this action is given a positive color. By expelling the knight and his wife, it is as if society restores justice and shows that such people have no place in it. Similarly, societys struggle with the destructive influence of negative actions is revealed in work. This occurs radically, as in most fairy tales banishment or execution (Sell, 2021). The fact is that the fairytale narrative most often contains a direct meaning without a hidden subtext, and such works cannot afford to demonstrate the step-by-step battle of society against unsanctioned phenomena. In this work, the limits of what is permissible for the world being described are strict- unusual creatures can only be accepted if they are benevolent, and the violation of moral foundations is punished radically.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this story, which may seem very linear at first glance, tells the viewer about the methods of excluding unacceptable objects from society. In addition, it also sheds light on the radical methods of dealing with unacceptable phenomena (Sell, 2021) that are also practiced in contemporary communities. It is clear from this work that if one does not give something unusual a chance but mistreats it right away, he can make a mistake by considering it to be evil. Rather than being the villain of the layan epithet reserved for Bisclavrets wifethe lycanthrope is a positive figure, one that is rewarded for his nobility and humanity in both of his forms (Sell, 2021). The work teaches modern society not to practice the methods of this tale and not to act too radically for selfish ends. Indeed, the deception will come to light sooner or later, and a public court will decide what boundaries what is acceptable to set and how to punish them for breaking them.

References

Burgess, G. (2018). Marie de France, Bisclavret. In A. Mittman & M. Hensel (Ed.), Primary sources on monsters: Demonstrare (pp. 89-92). Amsterdam University Press. Web.

Sell, C. B. (2021). The duality of a monster: The human-wolf dynamic of the sympathetic werewolf in Marie de Frances Bisclavret. International review of literary studies, 2(1), 1-10. Web.

Click Here To Order Now!

Sociological Line in Marie de Frances Story

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)