Analysis of Facebook and Pintor Oral Contract

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

Issue

The author of this essay addresses the legal issue that arose between Facebook and Eduardo Pintor. Facebook made an oral contract with a world-famous mural painter. Mark Zuckerberg, the founder, and president of Facebook, then terminated this contract before its execution. It is important to note that after the conclusion of the contract and before its termination by Zuckerberg, Pintor did not accept any other orders because of a deal of such magnitude.

Rule

It is safe to say that this case falls under the legal force of the Statute of Frauds. However, the question is whether the Statute of Frauds stops Pintor from enforcing his contract with Facebook. The author of this paper thinks the answer is yes, it does stop. Sections of the Statute of Frauds that should be considered in this case are the oral contract and Frustration of Purpose.

Application

Both parties entered into an oral contract. According to Californias statute of frauds, California Civil Code § 1624, generally requires that contracts which sell& stipulate performance or authorize anothers performance in the distant future must be written to be valid (Wex Definitions Team). Zuckerbergs decision can be considered here as a later and unforeseen event, which makes its termination due to the Frustration of Purpose (Frustration of Purpose). Therefore, Facebook had a legal reason to terminate this oral contract.

Conclusion

As can be seen, Pintor has no legal reasons and cannot enforce his contract with Facebook. The author of this work also proved that Facebook and Zuckerberg, in particular, had a legal prerequisite for terminating the contract. The only sufficient evidence that Pintor can use is evidence of the board of directors.

Works Cited

Frustration of Purpose. Legal Information Institute, Web.

Wex Definitions Team. oral contract. Legal Information Institute, 2020, Web.

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!