Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
“The Quality of a Prince” Machiavelli’s impression of a prince quality that the prince should do what he needs to do to maintain his position. The answer to “whether the desired ends justify the means used to achieve them” depends on the goals a person wants to succeed and the actions a person chooses. If the means used to obtain any good or noble, result must also be good or noble. Positive outcomes must be the means of moral right. Most people accept that there is no complication of using unethical means to get good results. They make good ends by manipulating the means. They give an excuse for Machiavelli’s saying to the point of the desired result. When we are young, we are most likely to do something immorally to get what we want. When I worked at a middle school in my native country, one of the students from the class was not interested in attending the class, so he said “I am not feeling well today” I worried and send him to the school clinic. So, he laid down on the bed and took a rest the whole day, I found that he was fine, and he did not want to attend class. The student used the cheating method to avoid the class. He didn’t think of the consequences of missing the lecture on the day. He got what he wanted but he was morally wrong in telling a lie. When people become more mature, they feel that they need to consider others’ affairs. One cannot do what he thinks is right, he must do what he should do with good intentions for the sake of others. It is not acceptable to take what we want, and in fact, we need to be aware sometimes the result does not justify the method. It is ethically wrong to do bad things to achieve something good. From my experience as a dental assistant in my native country, some patients used other insurance cards to see the dentist, they just want to get free or save money. However, they are not thinking of the consequences or the other affair. That action is morally wrong to do for the desired end.
People have taken the theory and tried to make it fit any situation they come across in their life. Most people mostly emphasize what they want to gain but less focus on what action to be used to be morally right. They will cover themselves to show a good outcome. They believe they can do anything that they think is necessary to achieve a desired end. They are not interested in another accountability. There are a lot of examples in our history to reach an argument for the idea. For example, the dropping of the nuclear bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended World War II. The war killed many innocent people, and the consequence of nuclear weapons still causes problems in the area. Even though it ended the horrible war, the method used was cruel. As Machiavellian described in “The Qualities of the Prince” “the only profession which befits one who commands:” The command of one leader can take many lives in our history. We compare the two ways of wrong and good morals with examples of experiences in our society, we can learn the consequences of two factors. For example, there are seats for the elderly and people who need them on metro trains in Taiwan, but some young passengers try to get a seat at peak time, and they do not care for others, even the elderly come on the train and the young passengers pretend to sleep to get the seat. Another example is that if a person is suffering from disease and almost dying, his family chooses to comfort him to death not him suffer painfully in the end. Both two examples arise a situation in which difficult to determine what should be done is morally right. The first example is a passenger can sit everywhere on the train, there is no wrong with his aim, but he doesn’t consider the older passenger who really needs the place more than he does. Therefore, the end does not justify the mean in the first example. In the second example, there might be arguments, even though a person doesn’t need to suffer that long and end his life in comfort way but not by nature. Some can point out that it is not killing one person and don’t want him to suffer. The end user is the purpose of not suffering that much which is right. However, the action chooses to end one life not by nature not be considered as morally right. Sometimes and somewhere in one life may involve in a situation that implies the idea. But all methods and actions one used must be ethical and morally right in any situation.
If a person chooses the unethical way to gain the result he wants, he can get what he wants in superficially but that does not last long in the end. There are many difficulties to come across with the consequences of taking the wrong way. Therefore, it is not acceptable to ignore the ethical way of doing in our society. Before taking the wrong action, it is needed to think that “Is it worth using the mean and can be accepted the complication of that?”. Mostly, the consequences are far outweighed by the benefit of the action. It affects others’ life. Every success one makes through only from hard work and perseverance. Actions are more important than achieved goals. Therefore, if we accept a meaning that is bad, it cannot truly result in a good way. Only a good end achieved through an ethical approach is what is justified.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.