Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Executive Summary
Ian Dobie writes about the contentious concerns of the distribution and utilization of the internet music and compares it with the concepts of copyright and property of music industry. In today’s world internet has facilitated the music artists to create, publicize and promote their music more easily but on the other hand it has created a big problem for the record companies as they are unable to control over the replication of their recordings done on internet.
The five largest record companies are Sony, BMG, Warner’s, EMI and Universal who have spent a huge amount of money to produce, record, promote and distribute their music recordings but this unique process has become worthless as their music is easily recopied on the CDs with the help of internet. So, to avoid this system has established the process of copyright, which permits standard rights to the creator.
As mentioned by the author the internet was initially developed for military purpose and their main objective was to share the information that was more technical and scientific in its nature but in contrast to this in commercial entertainment the analogue sound has been replaced with mp3 that has made a large file to shrink into a miniature one.
Mp3 was initially launched for two main purposes; one was to decentralize it known as the “gift economy” by Babrook so it can help to easily share music and information with their coworkers on non monetary basis and made MP3.com. And the second purpose was to create a peer to peer (P2P) services for the music industry and they created Napster (Dobie).
The author states that in internet world the music use is revolving around two main strings; one the sharing of authorized music such as MP3.com and the other is sharing of unauthorized music as done on Kazaa.com. If the authorized point of view is considered it has helped a lot of artists to become popular and successful by distributing and promoting their music through internet at a low cost and are earning a significant amount of money e.g. David Bowie.
Whereas sharing of unauthorized music has made it difficult for the major corporations to have control on their records the only solution to it till now is the copyrights and another thing they have introduced now is anti piracy campaigns in which their major objective is to constrict the Intellectual Property Rights.
The corporations have also established tightened oligopoly which is about extending the supremacy over the markets and for this the companies are merging with internet based companies such as AOL/Warner merger and they are tightening the copyrights.
The main objective of copyright is to “promote the progress of Science and useful Arts” but today it has been diminished and copyrights are being used as status quo in addition to this public statutory rights have been gone too. CD releases is also one of the big issue for the music industry but this can also be overcome by providing CD based copy protection technologies and the companies would have to provide value added services.
There are specific requisites that can help to promote music industry in future. A model can be created to distribute, promote and publicize their work which would help to spread globally. But there are three strands; first the justifiable market for copyrighted recordings, second the illegal market for foremost music brands and thirdly the legal market for independent music (Dobie).
According to my point of view there a lot of positive aspects mentioned by the author but in today’s world as the major record companies are suing the public is becoming a huge criteria as mentioned by Professor Plume in his article, he states that these prominent record labels have made the lives of general public really difficult.
These are the same people who were promoting their products by buying their CDs worth 20 dollars each and now these companies are targeting the same people by blaming s thieves and suing them. And due to this huge propaganda the record companies are earning nothing but are loosening their reputation among the general public because this internet is going to flow this way in the future too but these companies won’t be able to bring back their record sales as compared to previous years (Plume).
So as mentioned by Ian Dobie the record companies should be inventive and creative rather being reactionary and authoritative (Dobie). One more article suggests that by threatening almost 261 people, these hi-fi-record based companies think that this can help to bring their money back but in return what they are getting is nothing but failure and they have lost their long termed customers (Ali).
Works Cited
Ali, Ruhina. “Music industry.” Chicago Tribune 16 September 2003: 1.
Dobie, Ian. “The music industry versus the Internet: MP3 and other cyber music wars.” Ross Horsley, David Gauntlett. Web.studies. 2010.
Plume, Prof. The Music Industry’s raise to throne. 06 July 2010. Web.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.