Web Application Development

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

The Ways to Specify the Colors in CSS: Pros and Cons
Enterprise Web Development and Distributed Web Applications
The Browsers’ Internal Style Sheets Differences
The Compatibility of Website with the Browsers
Designing for iPhone Users
Issue of Contents and Devices Compatibility: Tables
W3C Standards for Developing Content for Wireless Technologies
Works Cited

The Ways to Specify the Colors in CSS: Pros and Cons

There are multiple methods of the color indication in CSS: hexadecimal color value, RGB, HSL, color keywords and X11, etc. (Dawson par. 1). Hexadecimal value is the most popular method to specify colors. It provides a large color range and is very precise, it thus widely supported by the internet browsers. RGB color value is also well elaborated.

One can specify the color by combining RGB red, green, and blue values. HSL color value successfully compliments RGB notation. HSL provides the combination of hue, saturation, and brightness. Color keywords specification has the easiest format because it doesn’t require any calculations of degrees and percentages. Previously, the keywords notation was too basic but it was expanded with the X11 color palette. Nevertheless, the lack of its support by browsers makes it difficult to use.

Enterprise Web Development and Distributed Web Applications

Nowadays, the programmers often argue about the best data models suitability for the application development. But according to the experience of many web developers, all the programming languages have advantages and disadvantages (Saint Laurent par. 4).

The main challenge in the development of enterprise applications is the choice of the language, data models, and scripts or their combination to provide the product’s efficiency. The choice of the programming language must be determined by the consideration of the multiple nuances and requires the strategic research. The second challenge is the development of the flexible design that could be suitable for a big number of devices. The success of the content delivery depends on the user’s technological capability.

The Browsers’ Internal Style Sheets Differences

The abrupt differences can be easily smoothened by the implementation of the layouts that can be adjusted according to browser’s environment. For example, one can choose a relative layout or an elastic layout. The relative layout adjusts the size of the page according to the browser’s view, and the elastic layout can be expanded or narrowed in size (Dawson par. 4).

The Compatibility of Website with the Browsers

The design will be developed for the travel company. It requires many pictures, it should be bright enough to draw attention yet shouldn’t repel. The sizes of fonts, the color matching, the sizes of pictures must be taken into consideration because the browsers can display them differently. The layout format will be the most relaxed and mutable. However, the smart placing of page elements and their correspondence with the website’s style is crucial.

Designing for iPhone Users

The design for iPhone users is more fixed; it can be kept up to the certain rules while the designing for browsers has to deal with the multiple differences of browsers’ capabilities. Nevertheless, designing for iPhones requires the designer’s comprehension. For example, a designer need to know that the element must be smaller, the text formatting must be suitable for the small screen, and the links should consist of more than one word to tap easily (Kyrnin par. 6).

Issue of Contents and Devices Compatibility: Tables

The large default tables can’t be completely seen on the screen of the mobile devices. Some alterations thus are required. A designer needs to take into consideration the amount of the table’s content and the device’s capability to support CSS and JavaScript. The content can be distributed in small tables, converted into a pie chart, or placed in PDF file with the link available for a customer (“Tables in Responsive Design” par. 8).

W3C Standards for Developing Content for Wireless Technologies

The W3C standards are needed for the developmental processes regulation and the positive outcomes of the design. HTML is considered to be a standard, and it is commonly accepted (Dubost par. 10). Moreover, the wireless devices can support only HTML and its variations.

The technology’s format must be considered by a designer, and the rules must be followed. For example, a designer needs to know that the mobile technologies usually do not support Flash and Cookies. A designer also needs to consider that the sizes of the elements should be relative.

Works Cited

“Tables in Responsive Design.” Liquid Light 10 December 2013: n.pag. Web.

Dawson, Alexander. “A Guide on Layout Types in Web Design.” Six Revisions 22 July 2010: n.pag. Web.

Dawson, Alexander. “A Guide to CSS Colors in Web Design.” Six Revisions 1 June 2011: n.pag. Web.

Dubost, Karl. “My Web Site Is a Standard! And Yours?” W3C Quality Assurance 8 April 2002: n.pag. Web.

Kyrnin, Jennifer. “How to Write Web Pages for Mobil Devices: Tips to Design Web Pages that Work Well on Small Screen Mobile Devices.” About Tech. n.d. n.pag. Web.

Saint Laurent, Simon. “Web Application Development is Different (and Better).” Radar 29 January 2014: n.pag. Web.

Click Here To Order Now!