Barefoot Running Survey: Evidence From the Field

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

The article written by Hryvniak, Dicharry, and Wilder (2014) is dedicated to exploring the relationship between barefoot running and the chances of injury/trauma in runners. The central claim of the source is that barefoot running does not increase the chance of most common running injuries and is actually beneficial for runners. The article’s intended audience includes academic researchers, sportspeople, coaches, and individuals interested in running. It provides key information on how injuries and beneficial effects were allocated in barefoot runners when compared to the control group. According to Hryvniak et al. (2014), “runners responded that their previous knee (46%), foot (19%), ankle (17%), hip (14%), and low back (14%) injuries all proceeded to improve after starting barefoot running” (p. 132). The authors concluded that barefoot running is beneficial or non-harmful to those participating.

Significance and Value

The reasoning provided by the article is grounded in medical knowledge and empirical observations of the matter. The issue was dealt with in-depth, with a biomechanical analysis of the results present. The source offers good insights on the effectiveness of traditional running shoes, methods, and prescriptions of such for runners. The evidence is supported by examples presented for particular respondents. Since it is an exploratory study, no contrasting views were presented. The authors did not expand on the foot-strike side of the topic.

Reliability

The article is posted in a peer-reviewed journal, which attests to its credibility. The authors utilized a quantitative method of gathering information, which is then analyzed using statistical tools. It helps eliminate bias and present the data in the most objective way. To conclude, the article is credible, reliable, academic, and not biased. Its results and conclusions can be applied to practical matters or used as a resource to support a more in-depth kind of research.

Reference

Hryvniak, D., Dicharry, J., & Wilder, R. (2014). Barefoot running survey: Evidence from the field. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 3(2), 131-136.

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!