Difference Between Social Contract, Utilitarianism, Virtue and Deontology

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

Introduction
Differences in Ethics Theories
Conclusion
Reference

Introduction

Ethics and morality are significant factors in society. In addition, ethical growth is a foundation of society. This essay gives a description of the differences in how ethical contractarianism, utilitarianism, virtue, and deontological ethics theories address ethics and morality.

Differences in Ethics Theories

The first attempt of determining the difference between ethical contractarianism, utilitarianism, virtue, and deontological ethics theories pioneers with presenting their definitions. Boylan (2009) describes virtue theory as a defining factor of success that represents a “good individual”. Utilitarianism theory entails ethically accepted actions. This is when these actions lead to complete usefulness for a group of people contrary to any other option (Boylan, 2009).

Ethical contractarianism entails theories that establish moral values and political options (Boylan, 2009). They rely on collective connections that entail perfect circumstances, for example, knowledge deficiency or hesitation. Deontological ethics entail the connection found in the responsibility and morals of individuals (Boylan, 2009).

These theories characterize the morality of individuals. This includes how they struggle to achieve success and reasonable benefits. Conversely, they reveal differences between the subject of ethics and morality. For example, virtue theory represents the personality of an individual in search of success in life (Boylan, 2009). It is evident that success is an intricate factor in life. This is, especially, when making the right decisions in an occasion. Utilitarianism focuses on principles and morals. This is by harmonizing the good outcomes on top of the bad. This theory indicates that human actions should lead to complete usefulness for the majority (Boylan, 2009).

On the other hand, the ethical contractarianism entails people coming up with accepted alternatives based on supposed shared contacts. Finally, deontological ethics entail individuals’ commitment to acknowledging moral responsibility. This gives an explanation of individuals who work hard to achieve value in their lives and in the lives of their friends.

Conclusion

In conclusion, ethical growth is a fundamental part of every society. The relationship and variation in the three theories are evident in the description. Ultimately, my personal experience focuses on how the theory of utilitarianism distinguishes ethics and morality.

Reference

Boylan, M. (2009). Basic ethics: Basic ethics in action. (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Click Here To Order Now!

Difference Between Social Contract, Utilitarianism, Virtue and Deontology

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)