Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
The topic of personal identity has been presenting a matter of interest for numerous philosophers throughout the whole history of humanity. An English philosopher, John Locke, advanced his opinion om this regard. Unlike others, who believe that personal identity is based on the substance of the soul and body, he focuses on consciousness or memory. His approach implies moral responsibility, which can be acquired by a subject. The main strength of his theory is the fact that it stimulates people to evaluate their actions. However, Locke claims that people will be punished for their crimes only in case they could remember them, which is definitely the weakness of his concept.
A Scottish philosopher David Hume offers another opinion in this regard and states that personal identity is fiction. He wrote: “I never can catch myself at any time without a perception, and never can observe anything but the perception” (as cited in Fieser para. 22). Therefore, an individual cannot describe himself or herself without the titles for events in their life, which were designed by other people. In this regard, his position may be similar to anatta to some extent, which implies the fact that a permanent soul and self do not exist.
The topic of personal identity is inextricably linked with the perception of the brain and soul. It has been changing throughout the entire history of humanity. Philosophers used to relate them as independent aspects, though the contemporary view implies the connection between them. In other words, from the perspective of modern philosophers, soul and mind present a unity.
As for my perception of self, I do not adhere to the concept of free will at all. I strongly believe that all the actions and occasions have their purposes and consequences. In this regard, my opinion may be close to determinism to some extent. However, from my point of view, future events cannot and should not be predicted, and they should be accepted for granted.
Reference
Fieser, J. “David Hume (1711-1776)”. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Web.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.