Participatory Politics for a New Age

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

The first issue is on electorship. The talk should be effectively distinguished from a speech by attaching speech to the mere articulation of interests by the use of appropriate signs. Communication should be noted to revolve around the reception, expression, hearing, reaction, and uttering. Representatives can comfortably speak on our behalf but it becomes difficult for them to listen in our capacity enhancing speech transmission in a representative system whilst reducing the listenership (Barber, 184). The Anglo American adversary system as advocated for in legislative politics puts a premium on speech and a fine on listenership with the intention of scoring verbal points whilst overcoming one’s interlocutor’s Speech is viewed as a form of aggression-a variation power and is seen as the war of all vs. all pushed by existing means.

The interactivity in self-legislation with powerful democracy balances politics of advisory by enriching the mutuality evident in listening. It calls for putting oneself in place, making insinuations, and speech recognition with the intent to make a comprehensive analysis and outcomes of my involvements.

Good listenership creates excellent advocacy and makes adept citizens and perfect neighborhoods. Liberalists have value attachments to formal equality. Also, listeners emphasize speech to enhance inequalities stemming from natural recourse and improve one’s ability to speak clearly, logically, eloquently, and with oratory prowess. That silence improves political talk as it nurtures reflections and empathy.

Various rights like the right to be heard and got on record prologues silence.

The second issue mentioned the effective and cognitive mode of a democratic talk. There has been evident guilt that accompanies over rationalization of a democratic talk by legal theorists and philosophers in their search perfection in the rationality of the world in terms of speech mediation. After the abandonment of Wittgenstein’s later suspicion on language and its confines, they have tirelessly attempted to avail domestic attachments to unruly words by use of logics and holding speech at ransom for certain reasons and trying to get talk for definition and exposure of its rationality.

Bruce Ackerman’s has proven the most outspoken in his attempt to impose a set of neutral constraints on language, in a move to make speech the bedrock of justice. In instances where justice emanates from the confine of breeding words, posses a displacement threat to the justice system as a product of political judgments. He argues that the quest for philosophical justice assumes an evasion from the unexciting send away of the world in actuality (Barber, 179). Talk that has its discipline from philosophy does not only accommodate in the world for pure reason but is also able to involve politics.

Philosophers do not remain the major culprits and hence can not receive potential blames for the upcoming notions of rationality craving from instrumental discretion together with the concepts of justice which have experience legitimization by enlightened personal interests.

When separated from artificial discipline, talk assumes a mediator of affection and affiliation, capturing identity and interest with regards to nationalism and independence. It is capable of building a community besides maintaining rights and seeking consensus hence conflict resolution. It provides meanings, essence, myths, expressions, solicitations, silences, rituals and a number of pronounced and passive results of our regular common humanity. Strong democracies advocate for trivial of institutions that voices on these things.

The third issue is the complicity of talk in action which has always been overlooked by theorists. Talk enables an invention of optional futures, creation of mutual purposes and construction of rival visions in a community. It has potentialities that are able to thrust talks into an array of intentions and results rendering it more provisional and concrete. Their failure as regards imagination comes from both the lack of patience of speculative philosophy bearing both the possibility and the intermediateness.

However, strong political effects accompanying actions are only possible to the extent where politics is carried in a world of fortune, emergency and improbability. Political talk is not seen as having an ability to make and/or remake the world. In fact, the posture of a prominent democrat is pragmatic as it involves the notion of looking away from first things including necessities, also of looking toward last things with regards to consequences, facts and results (Barber, 195). James focuses on adequacy and concreteness of facts and actions and defines pragmatism as the free atmosphere and nature driven possibilities contrary to dogma’s artificiality and the pretense of reality of truth.

Well-built democracy encompasses pragmatism reflected in active politics.However, James is noted to have not exposed the political ramifications of his take and instead wondered the nature and extent of pragmatism that pragmatism involves flexibility, has rich and endless sources and bears friendly conclusions.

A living democratic talk matches James’ assertion of pragmatism and its political consequences and exposes future talks to rely on the talk’s prime concerns. Further those strong democratic talks’ calls for efficient listening, speech articulations feelings, sober thoughts, careful actions and perfect reflections combined to produce a perfect democratic system.

CHART – Nine Functions of Democratic Talk

Function	Positive qualities	Example	Negative qualities	Example
Persuasion	Exhausts the possibilities of a political talk. Tools for convincing others of their own legitimate interests. A second major function of talk in democratic regimes Envisions a web of interests linking private to more general goods. Representation of rhetoric functions of talk. A link to stronger democracies.	Rationality of interests. Bentham’s principle of greatest happiness ,Smith’s invisible hand, awl’s original position Mouth pieces like rhetoricians, senators and barristers deploying the art of logics	Falls short of a truly public interests The senator does a small service to the idea of the public	Propaganda
Agenda setting	Province of elites Slight citizenship participation. Fixed and self evident, neutral and incidental Places its agenda first before politics. Defines mutualism in a community A preliminary of democracy	Communities, executive officers and pollsters. Deliberations and decision making. Pervasive and defining	Can not be set by means of talk and direct political exchange. Relinquishes a vital power of government Exposes the government’s power s of deliberation and decision to ongoing subversion. He who controls the agenda controls the outcome The ordering of the alternatives affect the patterns of choice	Abortion discussion The battle for the equal rights amendment. A compromise presented after positions have been polarized may fail/
The articulation of interests bargaining and exchange	a medium of exchange among competing parties seeking to maximize their self interests though market interaction -source of adjudication -source of aggregation	I want, How much will you pay.	Reduces talk to hedonistic speech of bargaining. Obligation is the provisional consequence of a bargain.	Free riders who do not comply with public policies incases of deficits are evident.
Exploration of mutuality	permits us to explore our differences in for mutually beneficial exchanges. every expression legitimate and provisional	Rational choice models as prisoner dilemma. Approximate and temporary position of a consciousness in evolution.	Analytical reason produces contradictions	Individual vs society and freedom.
Affiliation and affection	enables understanding and knowing of one another. separates the exploratory from the affective uses of talk in democracy. used by grass root politics to quaint democracy enhances empathy	Talk retains cognitive structure in exploring mutuality. Emotive expression Musical utterances Infection Ritual Symbolism Legislative houses, courts and voting. Affirms commonality	Cognitive speech is less appreciated	Formal rationality and liberal democracy forging partnerships
Maintenance of autonomy	helps overcome self interests. buttresses the autonomy of one immunizes values from ossification and protects the political process from rigidity.	Re encounter Re evaluate Repossess beliefs, principles and maxims	Least liable to representation. Autonomy is no moral turpitude	Only the presence of our own wills work on a value can endow that value with legitimacy.
Witness and self expression	Leaves room for expression of distrust, dissent or opposition. Allow people to vent their grievances Safety valve function	Frustration or opposition whether minority. Letting off steam Symbol of community’s heterogeneity.	Requires confidence	Expression without fear
Reformulation and reconceptualization	Insinuates in all other aspects of talk. Changes how we view things Clarifies the unspoken past Challenges the paradigmatic present Envisions the uncreated culture.	Re evaluations and reassessments	-One must be persistent to succeed. -shifts in ideology and political paradigms affect reformulation and reconceptualization.	-repeat same actions severally -different ideas
Community building aiding the creation of public interests ,active citizens and common goods	The development of a citizenry capable of genuinely public speaking and making sound political judgments. Creates a community capable of creating its own future	Speech deliverances Public handling of communication involvements Sound judgments in communication issues in the community.	-must be nourished by the community lest it fails.	Understanding the essence. Positive reactions to others’ opinions

Work Cited

Barber, Benjamin. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California. 2004.

Click Here To Order Now!

Participatory Politics for a New Age

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)