The Problem of Abortion in Today’s World

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Abortion-rights movements advocate legal permission for abortion. The problem of abortion is quite complex and multifaceted in today’s world. There are many issues related to religion, discrimination, and medical indications that prohibit abortion. Liberalization makes it possible for modern society to discuss abortions, investigate their causes, and find overall solutions. Author of the article ‘Tough questions — and answers — on ‘late-term’ abortions, the law and the women who get them,’ Ariana Eunjung Cha as an ordinary woman, is also interested in the topic of late abortion. She is a competent journalist on reproductive health and abortion. Since she often writes articles about infertility treatment, maintaining men’s health, and donating a woman’s eggs. Accordingly, the author has a holistic view of the health care system related to pregnancy and often communicates with women about the problems that concern them. Therefore, the choice of the topic of late abortion is justified because of the importance and need to cover this issue.

The lack of a sufficient point of view on the authorization and humanity of late abortions has affected women. All this has led to adverse consequences, from abortion tourism to the harassment and condemnation of women who have had abortions. Proponents of abortion argue that early pregnancy, violence and rape, medical contraindications, and physical or mental defects in the unborn child are the reasons for abortion. Accordingly, opponents reject those arguments that justify abortion and say that abortion is the killing of a child, according to religious and traditional beliefs (Ariana Eunjung Cha The Washington Post). The views of both parties were equally crucial throughout the discussion and remain relevant today. The situation of permitting abortions has been complicated by a misunderstanding of what can be considered a late abortion. Investigating the arguments and persuasiveness of the author’s position will highlight the admissibility or inadmissibility of late abortion.

The article’s reasoning is significant in the present, as federal bans on abortion continue to be imposed, taking away women’s ability to express themselves. The author’s main argument is that all women have inalienable rights, so the government cannot outlaw them. Every woman has the power to control her own body, life, and health regardless of specific circumstances. Additional thoughts relate to that late-term abortions should not be permitted or prohibited solely based on medical necessity. There are many other reasons why it is necessary to perform the procedure. For example, there are numerous cases when a woman does not recognize a pregnancy at the initial stage or makes a mistake in calculating her menstrual cycle (Cha). There are also diverse situations where the expectant mother is afraid to visit the doctor or is simply uneducated in her rights. The author also concentrates on the fact that the deviations in health can be detected in later terms; in that case, the situation changes dramatically.

Not every family is morally and physically ready to raise a child with special needs. Domestic violence, depression, and lack of financial resources are also the author’s critical arguments for supporting the legalization of late-term abortion. The thoughts are very logical and consistent, and it is imperative to emphasize that the journalist supports her position with statistics and research. The life situations of women of different social statuses are also described in detail; based on their stories, each reader can put himself in their place and understand why this topic is so critical and how the prohibition of abortion affects the fate of people (Oberman 5). It is also noteworthy that the author accurately expresses an opinion; she does not seek to impose her position on the audience but instead seeks to illuminate the topic and stimulate the reader’s considerations.

To this end, the same material also describes why regulations on abortion are not flexible, and the significant negative consequences of late termination of pregnancy are also stated. The central hedge is that the medical risks of such a procedure double after a specific week of pregnancy. It can have not only harmful but also fatal consequences for the woman. These reasons are very valid, but the author’s position is formed so that it does not call for any actions. The prime thesis is based solely on women’s rights and on their ability to decide whether they are ready to take on such responsibility. The grounds why such a procedure may be necessary at a later date have been identified. Since many examples also support this position, it is well-reasoned and clear (Cha). The data from medical institutions cited in the article also shows that the forced continuation of pregnancy can have the same negative health consequences as its late termination.

Moreover, the writer practices the technique of summarizing the arguments and proofs of different people, from doctors to priests. Various reasons are presented not separately but sequentially, which allows for maintaining contrast and tension. The author also tries to cover all the positions and weigh all the views to choose the most logical and justifiable attitude (Cha). Therefore, the scope of data provided and its analysis permit a woman to synthesize it from her position, thus compiling the argumentation and their own beliefs. Accordingly, it can be concluded that the article’s general idea comes from the author’s dogmas.

The journalist chose to print a subjective matter in Europe. At the same time, she wrote not only about the possible reasons for allowing abortion but also raised the topic of late abortion, which is considered more dangerous. The presentation of the problem is not to condemn a woman’s choice to get rid of the fetus later but to explore different people’s reactions and opinions. Thus, the article is written in a neutral tone, which does not cause a wave of criticism. However, due to the application of the technique of collecting and synthesizing various ideas and examples, the final idea of the need for late abortion is compelling. The author used examples from the law and politicians’ speeches discussing this vital subject, so readers rated the report authoritatively. As for the essence of the arguments, they are well chosen following the problems (Cha). That is, barriers to abortion are mentioned, which ultimately leads to delayed pregnancy and a woman’s desire to have a late abortion.

There are many approaches to this question, and they all contradict each other. It is worth concluding that the article is written to allow readers to apply critical thinking skills and make the right decision for themselves. It is also vital to note that the manner of writing is so well-disposed and persuasive at the same time that it is much easier to conclude in favor of the thesis belief than it seems to be.