Pluto as a Dwarf Planet: Search Log and Findings

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

Introduction
Search Log
Result
Works Cited

Introduction

I noticed a news article saying that Pluto is now called a dwarf planet, but the author stresses that it is only about words. Teepen notes that scientists “outsmarted themselves” as Pluto is still a planet, and there is no need to add any adjectives or start such huge discussions (6). Our notes (page 10.6) indicate that scientists changed the planet’s status because they found new facts. I decided to learn more about these facts to understand whether it was possible to change Pluto’s status.

Search Log

I typed ‘Alas Poor Pluto’ into the search engine “Google.” First, links were some blog posts. I decided that those sources could not be reputable. The third link was a link to a newspaper. I got interested. I read the newspaper and was very pleased. It had a lot of information concerning the debate, and it was quite humorous.

However, I decided that I needed some more facts and details. I wanted to know more about the dwarf planet. Thus, I decided to go to the NASA website. I decided to visit the NASA Solar System Exploration website. I thought It had a lot of information about the difference between a plant and a dwarf planet. I used the searching engine available. I typed ‘what is Pluto’ as I was interested in the way scientists define it. Many links focused on missions to Pluto, so I did not even read them. A short description of one of the articles attracted my attention.

Interestingly, it was the last link on the page. It was about Pluto’s status as a dwarf planet, so I decided to use the article. There is a short description, and I think that the article is good. After reading it, I can talk about the difference between a planet and a dwarf planet. The article also includes some information concerning the debate about Pluto’s status. It is easy to understand. Thus, I decided to use it.

Result

Pluto was discovered in 1930, but scientists changed its status in 2015 (Teepen 6). The author stresses that the biggest difference between the two notions is that a dwarf planet is smaller, but it is still a planet. The author’s parallel that the majority of Americans can be regarded as dwarf planets that are defined as bodies that “orbit the sun” and are “round” is quite funny (Teepen 6). It may be a bit hurtful, but I agree with the author as definitions are very similar, and there is no need to make a fuss about it. The author stresses that an adjective added to the word dies not to change the Pluto is a planet.

According to the NASA site, however, the difference is a bit bigger. Dwarf planets do not move around the sun the way the other eight planets do (“Dwarf Planets: Science Targets” par. 3). There can be more dwarf planets. According to this article, Pluto has a special place in the solar system as scientists call dwarf planets that “orbit the sun beyond Neptune as plutoids” (“Dwarf Planets: Science Targets” par. 5). Other famous dwarf planets are Ceres, Eris, and Haumea. This article helped me understand the importance of the adjective that was added. I understood that the status of a dwarf planet helps people who know something about astronomy understand Pluto is small and orbit the sun in a specific way.

Works Cited

Dwarf Planets: Science Targets n.d. Web.

Teepen, Tom. “Alas, Poor, Pluto, We Knew You Well.” The Tuscaloosa News 2006. Web.

Click Here To Order Now!

Pluto as a Dwarf Planet: Search Log and Findings

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)