A Qualified Ability to Survive

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

Creativity has always assisted man in his survival. Man has encountered numerous life challenges since time in memorial. Human ingenuity has been increased over the generations. Environmental transformation has forced man to develop and exercise an inventive mind. Originality can be a criterion for persons continued life existence.

In a group of eleven people, creativity was applied as a requirement for their survival. Established on an inventiveness criterion, four candidates were chosen to survive. Mary Evans, Mr. Blake, Mrs. Clark, and Father Frans were regarded as qualified to live on.

Mary Evans was chosen first based on her probable imaginative ability. Mary might perhaps utilize the skill in a successful future life. Mary’s background in trade school education might be fundamental in survival. It is reasonable to assume that Mary had qualification in business operations. The ability might be advantageous to her survival. Further survival proof may be fulfilled by her artistic abilities.

However, creativity might not be an assurance for Mary’s survival; conversely, the qualities, probably, will aid her continued existence. Mary’s sustained existence might be supported by her acquired training in trade. Mary Evans perhaps had inventiveness training; therefore, she might qualify in the criterion. Man having facts coupled with familiarity has probably increased over past centuries.

Human ingenuity and awareness has benefits required by world trade industries. The world has increased in its dynamism hence, innovativeness and inspiration is necessary (Stromeyer 2009, p. 1). Creativity in the modern world can be considered as a vital component for survival.

Mr. Blake was selected as a second candidate to survive. It was assumed that Mr. Blake had handiness capabilities. A possibility of creativeness could be attributed to Mr. Blake assuming his characteristics. Perhaps Mr. Blake’s B.Sc. mechanics qualifications may possibly assist him in creativity.

It may be practical to assume that Mr. Blake’s outdoors gratitude could guarantee his creativity. Coupled with a possible building knowledge, Mr. Blake can probably survive if selected. Mr. Blake’s promising qualifications might be suited for an ability to live on.

Mrs. Clark was considered as the third nominee for continued existence. Mrs. Clark’s electronics academic qualification could be assumed as a prerequisite to assist her survival. Possibly, Mrs. Clark’s electronics skills might develop into a handy means of life survival. Some individuals may argue that electronics might not have a guaranteed future.

There is a possibility in the reasoning. However, there may perhaps be a requirement for electronics application in future. Mrs. Clark’s ostensible engineering qualifications could be utilized in adapting survival tactics. An engineer is assumed to have an inventive mind. Mrs. Clark probably possesses an ingenious mind based on her alleged qualification as an engineer.

Mrs. Clark’s supposedly mechanizing attributes qualified her as a candidate to be selected to live on. It has been logically observed that increased world challenges required skilled humans possessing originality (Etuk 2002, p. 1). The attributes probably enabled humans to employ inventive traits that assisted their societies. Creativity has perhaps been the most elementary qualification for human life advancement.

The fourth contender chosen to survive was Father Frans. The father’s declared agricultural setting might aid his survival. An agriculturalist is believed to have a likelihood of innovation. Some people might reason that agriculture in isolation might not ensure life survival. The analysis might be logical; however, innovative farming could possibly enhance existence of man.

Farming activities are presumably a requirement for food production. Father Frans probably had a fruitful agricultural background to support life in future. Therefore, Father Frans apparently seemed suitable for survival based on his alleged farming state of affairs. It is assumed that humans articulated innovations in accordance to their creator.

Therefore, humans were assumed to utilize skills and experiments as a correspondence of their inventiveness (Novak 1998, p. 1). Man, most probably, has been created with a resourceful mind. Normally, when a need cropped up, the man’s mind may be required for innovation.

Seven candidates were not selected to survive based on their ingenuity inabilities. Bobby Dane and Jean Garcia were the first and second nominees with no credentials that could possibly show creativity capacity. Critics might have argued that Bobby and Jean were young and their potentials were unknown. The view might be logical; however, probability for the youngsters acquiring inventiveness is unknown and impossible to depict. Lack of acquired or human skills may perhaps have hindered Bobby’s qualification as a survivor.

The third candidate disqualified was to survive was Mrs. Garcia. Mrs. Garcia had no testimonials that showed any possible resourcefulness capacity. Rationally, it can be assumed that her inventiveness was suppressed by life events she encountered. To survive a candidate was required to have capacity to advance existing skills through creativity. Mrs. Garcia was assumed to have no pre-existing skills hence, her selection disqualification as a candidate to live on.

Mr. Newton was the fourth nominee that was not considered to survive. Innovation capability was assumed to be lacking in Mr. Newton. A presumption was made on Mr. Newton’s qualifications as a medical expert. Mr. Newton had not qualified in his study of medicine; hence it was assumed that Mr. Newton, possibly, was not able to be creative.

Allegedly, Mr. Newton was on track to having a qualification in medicine. The observation might be understandable; however, the reasoning may not necessarily qualifying Mr. Newton to survive. The impression may possibly not qualify Mr. Newton as creative.

Mrs. Dane was the fifth contender that was not recommended to survive. An ability to have creativity was not observed in Mrs. Dane. Her skills set were assumed to be centered on services delivery. Mrs. Dane’s qualifications might be thought of as fruitful. However, creativity that can be utilized in survival necessitated an inventive mind. Mrs. Dane was presupposed to work on pre-existing conditions in her practice. The assumed attributes disqualified Mrs. Dane as a candidate to survive.

Dr. Gonzales was the sixth participator that was not selected to survive. It was imagined that medical practice did not qualify a candidate to survive. Reasonably, medical doctors have enormous amounts of knowledge. The observation is sensible; however, the amount of knowledge was perhaps irrelevant to creativity.

Dr. Gonzales’s skills qualifications might not meet the creativity criterion. Equally, Dr. Dane was disqualified as the seventh candidate in the survivor choices. Dr. Dane had qualifications that showed no possible signs of an ingenuity capacity. Analysts may disagree with the disqualification of Dr. Dane’s highly skilled aptitude. To the extent that Dr. Dane was skilled it, however, appeared unrelated to the creativity criterion.

Creativity, as a skill, can be acquired by having an increased skills set. In the selection of individuals that might survive in future, inventiveness was considered as a pre-requisite. An innovative mind has assisted mankind to survive throughout generations. Ability to survive has been always driven by the saying that ‘necessity is the mother of invention’. Ingenuity can be developed from pre-existing skills. A lack of abilities renders creativity development impossible.

Works Cited

Etuk, Efiong. Great Insights on Human Creativity. trafford.com. 1 Sept 2002. Web.

Novak, Michael. The Judeo-Christian Foundation of Human Dignity, Personal Liberty, and the Concept of the Person. Journal of Markets & Morality. 1 Oct 1998. Web.

Stromeyer, Britta E. Tapping into Creativity and Innovation Today. Human Creativity is a Virtually Limitless Resource. 3 Feb 2009. Web.

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!