Desegregation: Civil Rights or State Rights

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

Introduction
The Author’s Background
Historical Content in the Document
The Purpose of the Document
The Main Argument in the Document
Conclusion
Bibliography

Introduction

In a segregation system, people of a given race or ethnic group have a different education system, commercial and housing facilities from that of other races. The document, “Desegregation: Civil rights or State rights” addresses the historical and legal aspects of the desegregation movement that followed the Supreme Court ruling in 1954 (Desegregation Unit Nd, 2).

The ruling generated much debate as whether the segregation practices violated the civil rights of the blacks. The 1954 Supreme Court ruling caused debate over the meaning of civil rights and state rights.

The Author’s Background

The author is a public policy analyst with particular interests in education policy and its implications. The author presents an analysis of the court cases that led to the elimination of the desegregation practices involving blacks and whites in the US. Using specific examples, the author argues that the Supreme Court ruling in the Brown vs. Board of Education was not in line with the “provisions of the constitution or the 14th Amendment” (Desegregation Unit Nd, 3).

The author supports the ideologies of the Conservatives as constitutional relative to the Liberals. For instance, the author cites Barry Goldwater, a conservative, whose views on integration and civil rights conflicts with the Supreme Court ruling (Desegregation Unit Nd, 4).

The author believes that the civil rights as enshrined in the constitution are different from state rights, and they were not violated by the segregation practices. Consequently, the Supreme Court erred in making the ruling in support of segregation.

Historical Content in the Document

The document addresses the historical events that gave rise to the desegregation movement. At the time, segregation in public education between blacks and whites was a common practice. The document explains the 1954 ruling by the then Chief Justice, Earl Warren on Brown vs. Department of Education enraged many white citizens especially in the South who were against integration (Desegregation Unit Nd, 2).

The document identifies the Plessy vs. Ferguson case, an earlier case where the Supreme Court upheld that “racial segregation was constitutional if the facilities were equal” (Desegregation Unit Nd, 3).

The Purpose of the Document

The major purpose of the document is to point out that the Supreme Court ruling erred as the segregation practices did not amount to violation of individual civil rights. It cites the original Constitution and the 14th Amendment as not applicable to public education and therefore, the ruling was an “abuse of judicial power” (Desegregation Unit Nd, 4).

Further, the document describes the ensuing debate regarding the civil rights and state rights that followed the ruling. It outlines the Conservatives perspective regarding segregation and that racial integration (Desegregation Unit Nd, 7).

Citing Barry Goldwater’s speech, the document explains that the “state rights are different from civil rights and that segregation practices did not violate individual civil rights” as suggested by the court’s ruling (Desegregation Unit Nd, 5). The document targets the US citizens where it explains how the ruling failed to recognize the principles of the American Constitution.

The Main Argument in the Document

The document’s main argument revolves around the Supreme Court’s decision on Brown vs. Board of Education that overturned an earlier Plessy vs. Ferguson ruling. The document describes this ruling as “a misuse of judicial power” (Desegregation Unit Nd, 4). In its ruling, the Supreme Court reasoned that segregation violated individual civil rights. In this respect, the document explains that the “civil rights cited are not legal rights” as identified by the Constitution or the 14th Amendment (Desegregation Unit Nd, 9).

Instead, they are moral rights that do not have any legal element. According to Governor George Wallace, the “ideology of the fore fathers is being attacked” implying that the ruling contravened the constitution (Desegregation Unit Nd, 16). Senator Barry while pointing to the weaknesses of the ruling notes, “Desegregation is a worldwide problem” and cannot “disappear by the passage of new laws” (Desegregation Unit Nd, 6).

Conclusion

The Constitution protects the rights of every citizen. The Supreme Court ruling with regard to segregation in the Brown vs. Department of Education cited violation of individual rights in its judgment. This raised debate over the definition of civil rights and state rights. In the document, the author cites various aspects where the author erred in passing the desegregation decision. It explains that racial segregation does not violate individual civil rights but the moral rights, which have no legal implications.

Bibliography

Desegregation Unit. Desegregation: Civil Rights versus State Rights, Nd. pp. 1-19.

Click Here To Order Now!