Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Ida Bell Wells-Barnett all her life confronted difficulties as a young woman experiencing childhood in the South. It gave the premise to her long-lasting aggressive battle against racism of African American people. She was born in 1862, a half year before the Emancipation Proclamation released the oppressed guardians from slavery (DuRocher 7). By the 1890s, lynching was a psychological oppressor mission to set the control of white people in the South (Wells-Barnett 44). Casualties were regularly the representatives of black ethnicity who were blamed for assaulting white women. Wells-Barnett questioned these accusations, noticing that frequently the charge was made after a man had been punished or killed (Wells-Barnett 45). The author had consistently fought for the idea that political strengthening was a key to equality.
Because of the Emancipation Proclamation, the Southern African Americans confronted the trouble the Northern black people had faced before the civil war. Freed individuals were threatened and unfairly treated by white residents. However, with many new regulations and great effort, the issue of racism has decreased and led the country to develop and ‘bloom.’ Thus, the phrase from How Enfranchisement Stops Lynching, “the flower of the nineteenth century civilization for the American people was the abolition of slavery, and the enfrinchisement of all manhood” refers that freedom and democracy ensures the growth of the nation in economic and prosperity-wise perspectives (Wells-Barnett 43). The historical events by the end of the 19th century brought many changes to the US, which built the foundation for the wellbeing of its citizens.
A few rulers and their allies deny equal rights by contending that this is important to build up the nation monetarily, accomplish public brilliance, advance racial or ethnic virtue, or make socialist heaven. This is to make an individual’s freedom an instrument that people with influence can control or overlook, contingent upon the work they need to be done. This is a damaging reason which for a long time has permitted tyrants to suffocate people. Freedom does not have a utility connected to the justification of the government’s actions. In this sense, democratic liberty is an ethical necessity, something that will be looked for or held for its characteristic virtue, and for no other explanation. The rights of all men should not be ignored to maintain a safe and opportunistic community.
There is a noticeable contrast in economy and society in times when individuals are free and have a voice versus enslaved. The results of the free nation are frequently the goals that many dictators attempt to achieve by limiting the guardians’ rights. Along these lines, focusing on freedom is a morally right choice, which also has positive outcomes. One of the enfranchisement’s stunning results is the advancement in prosperity and wealth. It is a proven motor of innovative and financial development. Numerous political specialists and financial analysts have contended that extended individual freedom and general political freedom are helpful for economic growth. In the developed industrial world, countries such as Britain, the Netherlands, and the United States were the principal adopters of tolerance and freedoms for minorities. Therefore, these nations turned into the loci of fast development in the enterprising area after the 19th century. These countries are also the ones to construct a portion of the fundamental social orders which set the guidelines for equal protection of all people.
References
DuRocher, Kristina. Ida B. Wells: Social Activist and Reformer. Routledge, 2016.
Wells-Barnett, Ida B. “How Enfranchisement Stops Lynching.” Original Rights Magazine, 1910, pp. 42–53.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.