Grady’s “New Findings Could Save…” Article Analysis

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

The General Impression From the Paper
The Most Successful Part of the Paper
The Least Successful Part of the Paper
Great Techniques Used in the Writing
Mistakes Found in the Paper
Reference

The General Impression From the Paper

I liked the article written by Grady for The New York Times about a new way to help stroke patients predict the development of negative health outcomes for two reasons. First, the structure of the work is clear and definite to attract the reader’s attention. The author introduced the main idea and explained why it could be effective in the healthcare field (Grady, 2018). Secondly, addressing urgent thrombectomy as a solution has its benefits and shortages, and Grady focused on all these aspects to inform the reader.

The Most Successful Part of the Paper

The most successful part of this paper is the explanation of why performing a thrombectomy on a stroke patient could save brain cells and remove clots in the blood flow. Comparing the offered innovation with traditional guidelines proves the possibility of changing the situation and creating a solid treatment plan.

The Least Successful Part of the Paper

The least successful part of the paper is not enough attention being paid to the characteristics of stroke patients and the conditions when people might need urgent help. There is only one sentence with information on how to recognize a stroke, and this article should contain more material to prove how dangerous this condition could be.

Great Techniques Used in the Writing

The author used the findings of the study conducted by researchers from Stanford University and paid for by the National Institutes of Health, proving data credibility. The combination of qualitative and quantitative data is a good technique that allows for learning the theme thoroughly. The reader can find the study using the offered links and read more information on the necessary topic.

Mistakes Found in the Paper

In my opinion, there are no significant mistakes in the chosen paper. The only recommendation that might be taken here is the importance of introducing the chosen medical condition, explaining its urgency first, and then describing the intervention.

Reference

Grady, D. (2018). New findings could save lives of more stroke patients. The New York Times. Web.

Click Here To Order Now!

Grady’s “New Findings Could Save…” Article Analysis

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)