The Clinical Implications of Cognitive Impairment

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

The Research Question
Hypotheses of the Study
The Framework of the Study
The Variables
The Literature Review
The Key Findings
The Practical Implication and Possible Changes
References

The Research Question

The question this study raises is the relationship between the cognitive abilities of the brain of a person who suffers from heart failure and the poor fulfillment of the patient’s ambulatory care conditions. This topic explores the relationship of not only the causes mentioned earlier but also the person’s personal qualities, as they also play a role in the analysis of cognitive abilities. In addition, it is essential to consider unique attributes as well since hospital confinement is not only dependent on the person but also their character and behavior (Hopp, 2018). This study addresses all of these topics and forms a general pattern for people despite individual qualities.

Hypotheses of the Study

The study hypothesizes that the relationship between the brain and indecisiveness in the treatment of heart disease is related because it is often the brain that refuses to perform the tasks formed by the wrench. Consequently, we can conclude that the worse developed thinking abilities – the greater the rate of heart disease in a person (Pudlo et al., 2019). In addition, the question is raised that with age, cognitive ability deteriorates, as well as the frequency of visits to the doctor for cardiovascular disease (Liori et al., 2021). Research suggests that there may also be a direct link between these two factors.

The Framework of the Study

The basis for the study was the test designed specifically for the elderly. Responding to it, the participants of the experiment received a certain number of points, which were then interpreted and entered into the table. The higher the index – the more visible connection between cognitive abilities and compliance with the rules of treatment methods the person (Ekman et al., 2001). This type of research can be called correct because not only the patients who participated in the survey but also the people who served as their caregivers. They served as intermediaries on whose data one could rely and make a sample of correct answers while calculating the possibility of giving false answers. This approach is the most optimal of all possibilities, and its use is justified in the experiment.

The Variables

The main variables in the study were various data on heart disease, such as length of time on medication, average blood pressure, and others. One of the critical variables was the difference in age and sex. It is no secret that women and men have different disease tolerance and mentality (Li & Xu, 2022). The experiment had to include data from other sources and not combine them into one category, which was done. Also, as mentioned earlier, age differences are essential since cognitive abilities tend to deteriorate over the years due to personal beliefs and human physiology (Gaviria et al., 2021). This point was also provided for and divided into separate categories, which is just as crucial for the final result of the study.

The Literature Review

After reviewing the materials used to write this article, several conclusions can be made at once. They are all important because of their relevance in the context of each source’s material. Each deals with the problem from its side or offers infographics and figures, which are essential in the course of the research. Thus, we can conclude that their use is justified in terms of the value of the material. However, there is another nuance that cannot be called positive. The whole problem is the materials’ publication date, which is considered outdated. This means that their use in current times is no longer relevant, and it is necessary to find more recent sources. Medicine is a science that is evolving rapidly, so it is essential to keep up with its pace and look for newer materials.

The Key Findings

As mentioned earlier, the basis for the experiment was a questionnaire created for the people who participated and the staff who spent time with them. The method considers qualitative, not quantitative, research because it is necessary to estimate not how many people will pass the survey but precisely the quality of its preparation and the analysis of the received data, which will not be started on the number of participants of the experiment. It was also said earlier that since patients can provide unreliable information, the survey also involved medical institution employees in establishing the credibility of the correct answers.

The Practical Implication and Possible Changes

In the end, it was concluded that, based on the obtained data, no connection between cognitive abilities and methods of heart disease treatment was found. This is confirmed by the results of the study, the provision of figures, and a thorough analysis of the data obtained. In the experiment, there were no restrictions as such, which made it possible to pass the investigation more smoothly and in a relaxed atmosphere. There are no complaints about changes that could have been made to improve the data collection methods. Everything was done at a high level, and a concrete conclusion about the problem was formed. However, on the other hand, it is also essential to consider the publication date of the sources. Since much time has passed since the most recent publication was used in this paper, it is important to repeat the experiment based on more recent material.

References

Ekman, I., Fagerberg, B., & Skoog, I. (2001). The clinical implications of cognitive impairment in elderly patients with chronic heart failure.The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 16(1), 47–55.

Gaviria, M., Pliskin, N., & Kney, A. (2021). Cognitive impairment in patients with advanced heart failure and its implications on decision-making capacity.Congestive Heart Failure, 17(4), 175–179.

Hopp, L. (2018). Introduction to Evidence-Based Practice: A Practical Guide for Nursing. F.A.Davies.

Li, L., & Xu, L. (2022). Comment on: Association among mild cognitive impairment, social frailty, and clinical events in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease.Heart & Lung.

Liori, S., Arfaras-Melainis, A., Bistola, V., Polyzogopoulou, E., & Parissis, J. (2021). Cognitive impairment in heart failure: Clinical implications, tools of assessment, and therapeutic considerations. Heart Failure Reviews.

Pudlo, M. T., Bionat, S., Agarwal, K., Taffet, G. E., & Bhimaraj, A. (2019). Decreasing heart failure readmissions among elderly patients with cognitive impairment by engaging family.Journal of Cardiac Failure, 25(8), S148.

Click Here To Order Now!