Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Introduction
Different factors such as contribute to communication failures among healthcare workers. A structured communication tool would be helpful in efficiently conveying patient information, lowering adverse occurrences, enhancing patient safety, enhancing the standard of treatment, and raising the level of satisfaction among healthcare professionals. Situational awareness, which entails knowing the patient’s current condition and clinical trajectory, is necessary for the transfer of medical information regarding a specific patient (Montgomery College, 2013).
Discussion
A variety of factors, including technology, people, processes, information design, and biology itself, affect communication issues. However, it has also been demonstrated that SBAR increases communication satisfaction among healthcare professionals and their sense that communication is more accurate (Shahid & Thomas, 2018). SBAR was initially introduced in hospital settings to improve nurse-physician communication in emergency situations. Numerous experts have emphasized and backed the function of the SBAR tool during the changeover (Shahid & Thomas, 2018). The key premise is that proper communication between team members is crucial in both the operation room and the intensive care unit. In this case, the SBAR framework can increase and develop communication possibilities in healthcare facilities.
The obstacles that healthcare workers experience while handing off patient care on a daily basis are identified in this article, and it is suggested that the SBAR communication tool be used more widely for patient handoff in a variety of healthcare contexts, including emergency care. This review’s ability to give readers a deeper grasp of the SBAR tool by pointing them toward research that has contrasted it with other patient communication tools is one of its strongest points (Shahid & Thomas, 2018).
Readers will thus be better able to comprehend how to use the SBAR tool. However, there are a few possible restrictions and limitations to the framework. The authors point out that an exhaustive summary of the evidence on the usage of the SBAR communication tool for transmission in healthcare settings may not be possible with a descriptive review (Shahid & Thomas, 2018). The conclusions of this analysis do not necessarily apply to other types of communications, such as nurse-to-nurse or doctor-to-physician transfers, as it concentrates on the usage of the SBAR communication tool for patient transfers between nurses and doctors.
The authors conclude by asserting that SBAR increases patient safety. There is some evidence that SBAR implementation is helpful in terms of patient outcomes, although this evidence is only applicable in certain situations, such as telephone conversations (Shahid & Thomas, 2018). Future studies are required to support the advantages of SBAR in settings of patient safety and to keep bringing attention to communication errors. A structured communication tool called SBAR has been demonstrated to lower unfavorable events in a hospital context.
Conclusion
The SBAR communication platform for authority delegation between healthcare practitioners is maintained by numerous medical associations and top healthcare organizations. In a variety of clinical situations, this communication tool is used to convey patient care and build a general mental model of the patient’s state (Shahid & Thomas, 2018). The SBAR communication framework is simple to use and can be adjusted to fit most clinical circumstances, although it can be challenging to use in challenging clinical scenarios, such as with patients in intensive care units. To complement its therapeutic use, the SBAR communication tool also needs educational training and a shift in culture (Shahid & Thomas, 2018). Overall, SBAR can be a flexible technique that works well in a variety of healthcare contexts, especially where effective interpersonal communication is needed.
References
Montgomery College. (2013). Nursing simulation scenario: Physical assessment[Video]. YouTube. Web.
Shahid, S., & Thomas, S. (2018). Situation, background, assessment, recommendation (SBAR) communication tool for handoff in health care–A narrative review. Safety in Health, 4(1), 1–9. Web.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.