Differences between First- and Second-Generation Antipsychotics

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

First-generation antipsychotics (FGA), which are also known as typical antipsychotics, first emerged in the 1950s. In terms of pharmacodynamics, they primarily act by attaching to dopamine D2 receptors in the brain and reducing dopamine activity, which is considered to be overactive in people with psychosis (Factor, 2020). FGAs have a high affinity for dopamine D2 receptors and are considered to be highly potent. Examples of FGAs include chlorpromazine, levomepromazine, clopenthixol, flupenthixol, and haloperidol.

Second-generation antipsychotics (SGA), also titled atypical antipsychotics, were generated in the 1990s and have a mechanism of action that is different from the FGAs one. SGAs have a lower connection with dopamine D2 receptors and a higher connection with other receptors, such as serotonin 5-HT2A receptors (D’Agostino et al., 2022). SGAs have a lower association with dopamine D2 receptors than FGAs and are considered to be less potent (Shakir et al., 2022). Examples of SGAs include aripiprazole, risperidone, quetiapine, olanzapine, and paliperidone.

Pharmacokinetics-wise, FGAs have a lower level of bioavailability, which means that a higher proportion of the drug is metabolized before it reaches the bloodstream and its target in the brain. Hence, a higher dose is needed to achieve the same effect as a lower dose of an SGA (Muñoz-Negro et al., 2020). Additionally, FGAs have a shorter half-life, meaning they are eliminated from the body faster, which may lead to more frequent dosing and greater fluctuations in drug levels in the bloodstream.

In summary, first- and second-generation antipsychotics differ in terms of their pharmacodynamics as they have dissimilar mechanisms of action and various paths of pharmacokinetics. FGAs bind at a higher level to dopamine D2 receptors and are considered more potent, while SGAs have a lower connection to dopamine D2 receptors and are considered less potent. Additionally, FGAs have a lower bioavailability and shorter half-life than SGAs.

References

D’Agostino, A., Aguglia, A., Barbui, C., Bartoli, F., Carrà, G., Cavallotti, S., Chirico, M., Ostinelli, E. G., Zangani, C., Martinotti, G., Ostuzzi, G., & STAR Network Depot Investigators. (2022). . BMC Psychiatry 22, 442. Web.

Factor, S. A. (2020). . Neurotherapeutics, 17, 1694–1712. Web.

Muñoz-Negro, J. E., Gómez-Sierra, F. J., Peralta, V., González-Rodríguez, A., & Cervilla, J. (2020). . International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 35(3), 129-136. Web.

Shakir, M., Willems, A. E., van Harten, P. N., van Lutterveld, R., & Tenback, D. E. (2022). . Schizophrenia Research, 243, 187-194. Web.

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!