Nokia Corporation Strategic Audit

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

TOWS Analysis

This is an important tool in the analysis of an organization’s progress. It is usually used in implementing tactics that would result in improved performance of an organization in comparison with the competitors (Hunger, 2007).

Internal Strengths

  1. It has strong research and development policies.
  2. It is known for creativity durability and reliability.
  3. Strong financial position.
  4. It is the biggest mobile phone producer.
  5. Workforce that is efficient and highly diversified.
  6. Most dominant in the world mobile market.
  7. It has one of the world’s biggest distribution networks.

Internal Weaknesses

  1. Profits dropped by 40% in 2010.
  2. It has a weaker presence in the US mobile phone market.
  3. Occupies a very fragile position in Japan.
  4. The closure of E71 and mobile handset distribution in Japan and other Asian countries.
  5. Poor after-sales service in India combined with few service centers.
  6. Mobile phones fetch higher prices as compared to China phones.

External Opportunities

  1. The joint venture with Siemens in which each company had a 50% stake.
  2. The fastest growing market in Asia-pacific.
  3. Market is being driven by-products that are stylish and fashionable.
  4. A very huge demand potential.

SO Strategies

  1. The presence in Germany to be increased by offering reliable products (O1, S1, S8).
  2. Use customer-driven strategies to increase presence in Asian countries (O2, S2, S4, S7).
  3. Use of a new product line and partnerships to penetrate the market (O3, S2, S7).

WO Strategies

  1. Increasing profits through penetration into different markets (O4, W1).
  2. Joint ventures to be used in penetrating the US market (O4, W2).
  3. Partnerships to be used to improve the position in Japan (O2, S5).

External Threats

  1. Huge pressure as a result of pricing.
  2. Consumers face complications in making choices.
  3. Chinese products entered the market overwhelmingly.
  4. Difficulty in product differentiation.

ST Strategies

  1. Reduce overall costs (T1, T3, S2, S8).
  2. Enhance the production of customer-oriented products (T2, T3, S1, S2).
  3. Cost efficient products to be offered (T2, T3, S1, S2).

WT Strategies

  1. Use of the brand image (T2, T4, W2).
  2. Remaining aggressive (T2, W3).
  3. Introduction of periodical discounts (T1, T3, W6).

SFAS Matrix

SFAS is a synonym for Strategic Factors Analysis Summary. It simply presents, in brief, factors that are strategic and which affect the success of an organization. It involves a person who decides to summarize the opportunities, strengths weaknesses, and threats in not more than 10 strategic factors upon which a decision is made (Saylor, 2010). Each factor is presented according to the weight it has in the process of attaining organizational success. The matrix is as shown below (Nokia, 2012).

Weight Rating Weighted Score Comments
Strengths Strength of the brand 0.13 5 0.65 The leading brand in mobile handsets in the world. It occupies the 6thposition in all brands category
Global positioning 0.13 4 0.52 Realizes significant revenues from many countries in the world
Outsourced manufacturing 0.13 4 0.52
Late to convergence devices 0.08 1 0.08
Weaknesses Social responsibility 0.08 1 0.08 Inconsistencies between the internal position and SOMO report
Opportunities Market share increase 0.08 4 0.32
Emerging markets development 0.13 4 0.52 Philippines and China
New technological developments 0.08 3 0.24 Visa Partnership
Threats Foreign exchange risk 0.08 2 0.16 Volatile economies
Product substitutes 0.08 2 0.16 Skype
Total 1.00 3.25

From the table, it is evident that Nokia as a corporation responds to the strategic factors positively than an average firm.

References

Hunger, D. (2007). Essentials of Strategic Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Nokia (2012). Corporate Responsibility and Nokia’s Supply Chain. Web.

Saylor, M. (2012). The Mobile Wave: How Mobile Intelligence Will Change Everything. Perseus: Vanguard Press.

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!