Quality Assurance Programme: Descrabtion

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

Introduction
Description of a ‘never event’
Description on addressing the staff
Discussions on the approach of validity and statements
Implemented measures
Conclusion
References

Introduction

Health facilities comprise certain campaigns and awareness that ascertain the long-term solution for the ongoing operations and efforts from the faculties in terms of incorporating management skills. In an effort to analyze the issues that affect the program formed to be delivered successfully, this study will cover the quality assurance program. To this end, it will seek to discuss what ‘never event’ is, the discussions on the type of ‘never events’ that occurred at the meeting, a description of how to address the staff immediately in the meeting, discussion on how to approach the examination on the validity of the statements issued. In an addition, the paper will describe the methodology used to explore the validity of the statements, and the measures to be implemented on an ongoing basis to prevent a recurrence of the ‘never event’ in that meeting.

Description of a ‘never event’

According to Reid (2011), ‘never event’ has been a terminology used mostly in the healthcare department to refer to a shocking contradiction that turned out to be an error in the field of medicine and healthcare. The term was first introduced by the former executive officer of the department of the national forum. The examples of a ‘never event’ ideas are the errors made by the surgeons doing an operating session. The patient’s life is risked forever, and the underlying factors do not justify the act whatsoever. The National Quality Forum has sought to describe the events through the use of other sectors that promote tragic circumstances that would have been avoided for the sake of protection and unethical conduct. The Quality Assurance Program helps in administering the various departments with the right opportunities and strategies to protect the measurements, and provides an opportunity for transformation and innovation from the feedback for revision (Jebb & Crumbie, 2014). The recent revision of the ‘never events’ was in 2011, and the list was added to 29, from 27 in 2007. Some of the categories in the sector include the surgical department, environmental department, radiologic, and the management and care department. The final category is the environment that seeks to explain the nature and the surrounding, based on the leverage of quality care for the environment and monitoring the service of conservation.

The focus on a specific ‘never event’ will be the surgical account that seeks to perform different actions from the approach from the same angle, from the rest of the health institution. There are events that include procedures that require strict instructions to be followed to the later for an effective outcome and sustainable means of power and cognition. Surgical events involve the body of a person that comprises many parts, seeking to achieve quality results and services by the end of the session. However, there are some things that are performed in the wrong manner that include interference of the body from an outside source, through administering the wrong dosage at the depths that are preventable (Mehtsun & Makary, 2013).

The assumptions on the stages to use and steps to follow when administering such expertness have been argued to be intrusive in the department of surgical awareness and the surgeons responsible have been accused for the same reason. The surgery can also be performed in the right manner using the required apparatus, but in a wrong patient, causing condition between the scheduled operating results and the effective means of communication within the health facilities. In most of the time, this occurs due to lack of communication that would affect the tragic event, causing the death of an individual.

There are some foreign products administered to the patients, and this is accidental, causing some dilemma for the same experiment and the procedure tends to backfire, resulting in the active administration and passive communication between the physicians. Unintended administration of drugs has been a case of conflict since the panel fails to follow the right diagnosis and the ethos to help the patient be out of danger (Gitmo, Zoo, & Birdbath, 2013). The intraoperative cases the United States seeks to explain are some case scenarios based on the argument of ideological differences from the force that seeks to clarify the procedures for the same reason and the purposes seem to be fluctuated.

Description on addressing the staff

The staffs are important individuals in the incidences of the ‘never events’ that will seek to explain certain situations, issuing the right segments for the same reason on how things occur or operate. The staffs require training that is thoroughly examined, and a good command of the knowledge based on what they intend to achieve. The intention of communication skills is to promote an understanding based on the awareness on how to administer and address certain issues, with the consideration of covering the prospective factors in the line of the articulation results that will observe the staffs and the activities.

Discussions on the approach of validity and statements

Norton (2011) found out that the main issue is always identifying the underlying factor and the ways of resolving it, based on the environmental factors for the same purpose. It is accurate to observe the thorough methods of promoting growth and development from the mindset of people who attractively consider the outcome as the feedback to soiling issues in future. The decision-making processes are based on the long-term strategies to help in solving the problem. This includes accurately collecting of the right tools to administer an approximate research method, and consider the factors that may hinder the data analysis from taking place. The statements issued should be based on the factors of control and duty regulations that enable individuals identify and master the vital aspects that promote the aspects of ‘never events’ (De Jong & Nicholas, 2011). Consideration of the factors such as payment issues may bring the mentality and enlighten the physicians who may be reluctant to offer their services since they are unable to consider the payment that is usually low.

Implemented measures

The aims and objectives set for an environment are to create awareness from the long-term strategies and improve factors on the behaviors that may promote untrustworthiness. Some of the measures to be set by the physicians are genuine qualities, and the ability to consider certain reputation based on the accurate steps to follow during this period is important too. Considering the staffing environmental working conditions and taking precautions in promoting the right methods for such issues will prevent certain issues from occurring, as there are accurate approaches to take when observing a situation from the concept of the effective communication and strategic planning. Issuing stamen on the certified abilities to consider proper firm background and approaches will promote the factors of adherence and decision-making to be accurate. The availability of resources and funds to be sued in the surgical operations are to be budgeted for to cover for all the expenses required during surgical operations. The environment where the surgeries take place is vital since the approach emulates the decisions that may involve staff meeting and other patterns which have resolved at redirecting their energies in the same manner.

The right method of creating assurance for the data and attempts on the ‘never events’ is to archive the information of the apparatus that were provided and administered on what dates and which methods. Such commodities and factors create an approach for the abilities of the same decision-making. A panel of educated individuals and the responses required for the same project coupled with the advancement of the right people through technological equipment and procedures is the logical step to take. It is accurate to consider some factors that emulate the appropriate strategies that may hinder certain issues from occurring and creating a structured scheduled that provide the quality assurance for the same reason. Having a set of goals to consider when emulating such practices create safety and creativity in the same forum.

Conclusion

The quality assurance program observes and considers the regulations and set of rules that tend to govern certain issues that may be challenging to the rest of the group. It is important to have a focused mind and determination for the immediate success and observations that will promote effective communication in different dimensions. Such issues should consider accountability and the flexibility of people to create time for the practices and passion in the endeavors.

References

De Jong, V., & Nicholas, J. S. (2011). Overview of the quality assurance movement in health care. Best Practice & Research, 25 (3), 337-347.

Gitmo, H., Zoo, Q., & Birdbath, D. J. (2013). the cause of never events in hospitals. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 4 (3), 338.

Jebb, P., & Crumbie, A. (2014). Never say never event: Should unsafe staffing in hospitals be classed as a ‘never event’? Nursing Standard, 28 (19), 28-29.

Mehtsun, W. T., & Makary, M. (2013). Surgical never events in the United States. Surgery, 153 (4), 465.

Norton, E. (2011). Using an alternative site marking form to comply with the universal protocol. Association of Operating Room Nurses, 93(5), 600-602.

Reid, J. H. (2011). Surgical never events should never happen. The Journal of Perioperative Practice, 21(11), 373-378.

Click Here To Order Now!