Starbucks Company’ Transformation and Impact on Community

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

Factors Behind the Decline
Aspects of Transformation
The Role of Starbucks
Conclusion
Works Cited

Factors Behind the Decline

There were several important factors behind the 2007-2008 Starbucks decline. Starbucks’ consumer fulfillment rates began to decay regardless of the fact of Starbucks’ irresistible existence and handiness (Koehn et al. 5). There was a very slight appearance of merchandise distinction between Starbucks and the less significant coffee shops. Nonetheless, there was a substantial difference between Starbucks and the autonomous coffeehouses. The trademark perception of Starbucks also had some jagged edges.

New clients were beginning to settle with the fact the Starbucks was interested principally in gaining profit and constructing more coffee shops (Susanty and Kenny 17). Additionally, even with the great consumer print scores, customer fulfillment rates were diminishing. It was supposed that there was a provision breach between Starbucks totals on major features and consumer contentment. In surveys by clients, enhancements to service, predominantly quickness of service was utmost brought up for development.

The total corporation service had not essentially deteriorated. Generally, customers were satisfied with the cleanliness, atmosphere, and merchandise excellence (Aiello and Dickinson 307). Nevertheless, the time lag was progressively growing. This was the core issue because some individuals went to Starbucks for the experience, but the general public got their coffee and left the shop. Consequently, the wait time was exceptionally central. Although the wait time was a measure of client happiness, it was not the single factor that regulated consumer fulfillment (Gurski 11).

The consummation level of consumers similarly varied with the category of clients. Customers that stayed more frequently and were more faithful inclined to be very much contented. Furthermore, Starbucks was evaluating how the public looked at the business, as trying to grow and make the profit, rather than support the image of the company (Schultz 99). Despite the not so obvious fact that consumer service has degenerated to some extent, the central problem was the interpretation of the Starbucks business.

Mostly, the problem was that the company became too energetic. In Manhattan, for instance, there were almost 200 stores. Even New Yorkers saw that as a bit too much. As the study by Harvard Business School stressed, Starbucks was guilty of excessive extension (Koehn et al. 11). To develop, Starbucks progressively attracted the clients for whom it meant rapidity of order provision instead of acknowledgment by and discussion with a barista. Undeniably, Schultz himself recognized the problem as it was obvious that Starbucks no longer had the personality of the past and represented a characterless store as opposed to the heartfelt sensation of a local coffee shop.

Aspects of Transformation

The most important aspects of Starbucks’ transformation were the undeniable authority in the coffee market, encouragement for their associates, and an impassioned connection with their consumers. The initial phase of the change was to dare the management team to agree to take responsibility for the self-made faults. As the presiding officer of the board, Schultz admitted to the whole corporation that he was just as guilty of the current situation as the functioning frontrunners.

This repeatedly ignored stage in the course is critical to accelerating the transformation (Susanty and Kenny 17). Lacking the readiness to take charge, leaders pass their time mitigating past choices before learning from faults and making instantaneous development modifications. It was vital to Schultz that all executives and subordinates revived the connection between each barista and consumer (Schultz 201). To help certify this, Schultz formed a very open manifestation of this pledge to be answerable and accountable for every consumer experience.

In the middle of commercial anguishes, the company paid out $30 million and sent all 10,000 Starbucks administrators to New Orleans for an enterprise meeting. The crew introduced several enhancements intended to transform the economic situation of the business rapidly. For the first year, the corporation cut almost $600 million in expenses, of which 99 percent were everlasting and not affecting the customers. Starbucks also made significant changes in the stores to have improved merchandise and service contributions, together with reinstating Pike’s Place, vending healthier appetizers, and introducing a different loyalty card.

In conclusion, Starbucks overlooked conservative advice and presented its extremely widespread brand of instant coffee, VIA (Schultz 257). With more than $100 million in yearly sales throughout its initial year, VIA gave the compulsory boost in addition to founding quite a few new distribution places for the business. As Schultz specified, Starbucks’ product is centered on the superior-class coffee but more imperative on the connection each consumer has with a barista. In a culture where decent service is intermittent, and rudimentary politeness is regularly absent, Schultz believed the enterprise would take a standpoint and exhibit courtesy, esteem, and confidence in each consumer communication (Koehn et al. 56).

Besides, greatly to the disappointment of Wall Street, Schultz stopped reporting regular data to move the gravity point from making good numbers to creating a decent experience. Such ingenuities are generalizable in the larger context of business improvement, but only to a limited extent. The reason for this is the characteristic difference between the businesses. In other words, the measures that were taken by Schultz are only applicable to Starbucks, but they can be applied to any other business if they carefully address the crucial issues and personalize the approach.

The Role of Starbucks

With the changes that are present now, it is safe to say that Starbucks had successfully restarted the personality of a for-profit business. Schultz made an amazing effort to evoke the legacy, belief, and passion. The value of the transformation brought by the renowned CEO can only be assessed when one realizes that the changes had an impact on the community, not only Starbucks personnel. The company managed to find the perfect balance between their need for profit and the need for keeping the image of a heartfelt and convenient neighborhood coffee shop.

The representation of the brand became a cornerstone of the success of Starbucks, and it is no surprise that it is so popular nowadays among so many people. The company should also take private credit for how it is positioning itself in social media (Chua and Banerjee 237). Starbucks strives to keep the connection between the company and the customer both on- and offline.

Saying that Starbucks redefined the role of a for-profit company, Schultz means that the business should keep its integrity and pay close attention to the customers’ wishes and needs instead of blindly following the market trends to be successful. Schultz also totally rationalized stock chain operations – sending goods to stores more proficiently and refining inventory.

Starbucks was the first US business to propose complete healthcare treatment and parity in the form of a standard to the part-time members of staff. In many ways, Starbucks pioneered the market and managed to stay relevant throughout the years. Excellent management and devotion to the core principles became the factors in one of the most successful comebacks of the past decade. Schultz is not especially concentrated on the customary bottom line.

He is a vibrant prototype of a broadminded CEO who is as motivated by collective issues and staff prosperity as he is by income level. The salary scramble strengthens Schultz’s long-lasting pledge to participating in his employees’ accomplishments, and it makes Starbucks one of the main actors in the biggest commercial story in America in the present day.

Conclusion

For Starbucks, there are more than several courses of action. The company experienced both rises and falls, and it teaches modern businesses a lesson – there is nothing more important in business than customer loyalty and devotion. Starbucks’ brand has been revived for a reason, and that reason was, in fact, not the money losses but the necessity to give the customers the genuine and warm feeling of contentment. The company should keep walking down the way of creating a bond between its workers and customers.

Over the years, Starbucks became an iconic place for those who love coffee and courteous staff. Howard Schultz is a role model and an empowering leader for his workers, and it looks like the company will develop and grow further under his passionate guidance. The approach cultivated by Starbucks became an origination in the world of heartless and faceless businesses that are only aimed at the profit of the organization, often failing to recall the needs of their workers and customers. This is why Schultz’s company should embrace its strategy and keep its customers close, providing them with high-quality products and services.

Works Cited

Aiello, G., and Greg Dickinson. “Beyond Authenticity: A Visual-material Analysis of Locality in the Global Redesign of Starbucks Stores.” Visual Communication 13.3 (2014): 303-21. Web. 15 Aug. 2016.

Chua, Alton, and Snehasish Banerjee. “Customer Knowledge Management via Social Media: The Case of Starbucks.” Journal of Knowledge Management 17.2 (2013): 237-49. Web. 15 Aug. 2016.

Gurski, Daniel. Customer Experiences Affect Customer Loyalty: An Empirical Investigation of the Starbucks Experience Using Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Anchor Academic Pub., 2014. Print.

Koehn, Nancy F., Kelly McNamara, Nora N. Khan, and Elizabeth Legris. “Starbucks Coffee Company: Transformation and Renewal.” Harvard Business Review. 9.314 (2014): 1-71. Web. 15 Aug. 2016.

Schultz, Howard. Onward: How Starbucks Fought for Its Life without Losing Its Soul. New York, NY: Rodale, 2011. Print.

Susanty, Aries, and Eirene Kenny. “The Relationship between Brand Equity, Customer Satisfaction, and Brand Loyalty on Coffee Shop: Study of Excelso and Starbucks.” ASEAN Marketing Journal 7.1 (2015): 14-27. Web. 15 Aug. 2016.

Click Here To Order Now!