Companies Requiring Dress Code: Argumentative Essay

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

Companies Requiring Dress Code: Argumentative Essay

Summary

Policies are significant in the working environment as they fortify and explain the standards expected of workers and assist bosses with overseeing staff all the more viable as they characterize what is worthy and unsuitable in the working environment. This paper focuses mainly on four policies: sexual harassment, non-discrimination, employee benefit, and dress code; particularly why they should be implemented in a small company.

Human Resources Policies

Sexual Harassment

Sexual harassment keeps on being a problem in American workplaces. In 2018, the United States Equal Employment Opportunities Commission review revealed that 1 out of every 4 women (25%) and 1 out of 6 men (16%) have encountered sexual harassment in the workplace (U.S. EEOC). In 2019, tragically, there are still great figures for this type of harassment.

Sexual harassment is a critical issue, and the ramifications for both workers and employers were not kidding and broad. People experiencing sexual harassment face working in a horrendous, threatening, or risky condition, frequently every day, in danger of physical or emotional trouble (Hunt, Davidson, Fielden, & Hoel, 2018). With efficiency and enthusiasm levels predisposed to drop because of harassment, their professional movement can likewise be influenced, and they may even get constrained out of their activity and income (Shaw, Hegewisch, Hess, 2018).

Companies additionally endure the effects of sexual harassment in their specific manner, getting subject to negative effects, for example, poor work culture, low morale and efficiency levels, and budgetary worries from higher staff turnover (Shaw, Hegewisch, Hess, 2018). Being free from sexual harassment is a fundamental human right. Furthermore, under US law, everybody has a lawful right to live and work free from sexual harassment. For workers, this implies both during working hours and at any type of business-related training exercises or capacities (Firestone, 2018). As a business, paying little mind to whether you’re a large company or small business, you must keep up a workplace that is free of sexual harassment. Fundamentally, businesses and managers find a way to advance a protected and positive workplace for their workers (2018).

The United States Department of Justice defines sexual harassment as “ any nonconsensual sexual act proscribed by Federal, tribal, or State law, including when the victim cannot consent (U.S. DOJ, 2018). Sexual harassment can take various structures. Regardless of whether somebody is staring improperly, making sexually interesting remarks, telling or messaging wrong ‘jokes’, or exposing an employee to unwelcome physical contact. These models are viewed as sexual harassment and must be tended to (2018).

The way to prevent sexual harassment is for bosses and executives to guarantee that they have a distinctive and unique policy set up, that characterizes sexual harassment and layouts’ unsatisfactory conduct and its results (Shaw, Hegewisch, Hess, 2018). Execute a proficient sexual harassment policy and give continuous training to all staff to make it obvious to each worker that sexual harassment is 100% intolerable in the workplace.

It’s imperative to set up the company as a no-resistance workplace for managing sexual harassment. The truth of the issue is that counteractive action is the key factor if the company needs to change its way of life. To do this, trust must be worked with the management by adhering to the arrangements and not permitting any worker, regardless of their position, to get away from a careful examination if a report is made (Firestone, 2018). If the company can guarantee protected and dependable methods if an employee reports sexual harassment, each representative will confide in the organization and have a sense of security about the method of approach.

Nondiscrimination

Age, sex, physical appearance, religious belief, sexual orientation … The list of discrimination in the world of work is long. Solutions exist to effectively combat this scourge, but the road ahead to reach a virtuous model is still long. Discrimination at work can be defined as unequal treatment between two individuals, not because of their productivity, but because of their gender, their belief, or their physical appearance (U.S. EEOC, 2019). Many employees feel discriminated against, but few can prove it. However, the law strongly sanctions this type of behavior within a company. But, difficult for example, when one is a candidate for a new position, to justify discrimination without having access to the profiles of other applicants. Concrete actions to fight effectively against discrimination, especially within companies, must be taken on a much broader scale. In this section, we will focus mainly on why small businesses as well as large organizations need to incorporate non-discrimination policies in their handbook.

Removing discrimination from your company is a test yet one that can improve the odds that you won’t need to fight previous employees in court or devise imaginative approaches to hire new candidates (Demuijnck, 2009). Building up an equal employment opportunity policy sets up a basis for a company’s crucial way of thinking on common regard, however, it’s just the beginning. Promise that policy requires the enduring help of the company’s most significant level of initiative, which streams down to directors, other managers, and staff (2009).

The work environment of the organization should give each representative a voice (Demuijnck, 2009). By battling against discrimination, singular employees are given opportunities and the conviction that they can accomplish and rise in their professions. Regularly, it is the least fortunate individuals who are oppressed, so giving them openings in your workplace empowers the improvement of confidence (Blanchflower, Levine, Zimmerman, 2003). Perceive the respect of every individual and commend it in an inspiring domain (2009).

Freeing your workplace of discrimination builds up a climate of solidarity. Your zero resilience of acts of injustice alongside your standards set a model for the employees. At the point when the company practices fullness by allotting workgroups made out of differing staff individuals, it shows confidence in the powerful organization (Demujnck, 2009). In like manner, promoting an employee who utilizes a wheelchair to a supervisory position represents your organization’s certainty that those with physical contrasts can execute just as others in insignificant-level positions(2009). A guarantee of a nondiscrimination condition is helpful for better assurance, more prominent cohesiveness, and a higher generation.

Employee Benefit

Any business depends entirely on its employees. Indeed, essential for the development and growth of their activities, employees are elements that should not be overlooked, especially for companies that operate in a sector where the workforce is scarce.

As a result, many companies are implementing systems or policies in the employees’ handbook that above all allow them to retain their employees and also optimize their working conditions. And for this, there are mainly the salary benefits, which may or may not be mandatory, and which are greatly appreciated by all employees. The question being asked is, why is the employee benefits policy so important to have?

By definition, employee benefits are other forms of compensation enjoyed by employees of a company (Klonoski, 2016). Salary benefits are therefore additional sources of income in addition to salary, and can, therefore, be presented as gifts, bonuses or also fringe benefits, and so on. 79% of employees would prefer to have new or extra benefits rather than pay increments. Great wages are significant, however, so are great benefits. Benefits aren’t only attractive to employees. They can improve the business. Including benefits can build loyalty, center and profitability, participation, and selecting

At the point when you offer employee benefits, your employees are bound to be faithful to your business. As per one overview, 60% of employees said having a benefits bundle is incredibly important or imperative to their manager’s loyalty (Workforces Report, 2016). Employees need the capacity to single out their benefits to coordinate their ways of life. A study shows that 72% of employees said that the capacity to alter benefits builds their loyalty (A New Age of Benefits, 2017). Offering a restricted arrangement of benefits doesn’t let employees pick what works for them. At the point when employees are increasingly steadfast, they are bound to keep working for you. Beginning a benefits program or adding to your present one can persuade employees to remain. 36% of employees state improving their benefits bundle is one thing their bosses can do to keep them in their occupations (2016).

The absence of benefits can affect the employees’ capacities to focus and be profitable at work (Laundaon, Cathcart, & Mcdonald, 2019. How? Indeed, employees may be stressed over things in their own lives, for example, childcare, sicknesses, and money-related issues. On the off chance that employees are stressed over these things, they aren’t centered around work. An organization can offer benefits that will assist employees with assuaging their pressure. At the point when employees can deal with issues past work, they can be increasingly present at work (Klonoski, 2016). Of overviewed employees, 51% admitted that benefits sway their capacity to center at work. What’s more, an extra 51% admitted that benefits command their profitability at work (2019).

By giving benefits policies, you improve your capacity to bring in new applicants and contract new employees (Laundaon, Cathcart, & Mcdonald, 2019. Organizations may think an enormous paycheck is a thing that draws in employees, but as covered in the lecture, employees are searching for more than just a paycheck. Be that as it may, benefits are similarly as significant as wages. A study found that 55% of employees are in any event fairly prone to acknowledge a vocation with marginally lower pay on the off chance that it has better benefits (Laundaon et al., 2019).

Dress Code.

Time has changed and today it seems to be a free-for-all insofar as dress code. Why do companies still need a dress code policy today and why is it so prominent? The importance of a dress code for professionalism is as multifaceted as options for proper clothing.

A business’ standard for dress codes makes a standard for visual connection. This enables employees to feel some portion of a company and fits a feeling of all progressing in the direction of one main goal (Levi, 2008). It’s likewise obvious that if one individual dresses like it’s a picnic while another dresses in formal attire there will be some unwieldiness (2008).

Positively, employees reserve a privilege to communicate through their attire yet by that equivalent token do as well companies, and workplaces maintain whatever authority is needed to express how they need their business to portray itself (Mitchell, Koen, and Moore, 2013). Regardless of whether purposeful or not, how one’s dress communicates something specific. It is dependent upon employees to guarantee that the message passed on by their appearance is that they’re a piece of the organization (2013). Having a dress code policy allows both the employees and the business to represent their goals and vision through their attire.

Employees are supposed to represent their workplace. The business objectives and ideas are reflected in who it decides to contract (Brown, 2014). The norms for proficient clothing change from business to business, so it is dependent upon each industry to pick its very own guidelines (Levi, 2008). Regardless of whether somebody works in an office with almost no forward-looking connection, the general standard is everybody should dress as though their customers could get through the entryway at any minute.

Reference:

Aflac, Workforce Report. (2016). Fact Sheet. Retrieved from https://www.aflac.com/docs/awr/pdf/2016-detailed-findings/awr.2016-fact-sheet_small-business-trends-less-than-50.pdf
Blanchflower, D., Levine, P., & Zimmerman, D. (2003). Discrimination in the Small-Business Credit Market. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 930-943. Retrieved from https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy.liberty.edu/stable/3211816?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Brown, K. R. (2014). Address dressing for success. Workforce, 93 (8), 22+. Retrieved from https://linkgalecom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/apps/doc/A380525278/ITOF?u=vic_liberty&sid=ITOF&xid=f58f9c57
Demuijnck, G. (2009). Non-Discrimination in Human Resources Management as a Moral Obligation. Journal of Business Ethics: Vol. 88, Iss.1. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/198224761?pq-origsite=summon
Firestone, K. (2018). Dealing with Sexual Harassment When Your Company Is Too Small to Have HR. Retrieved from https://psycnet-apa-org.ezproxy.liberty.edu/fulltext/2010-04488-002.html
Hunt, C.M., Davidson, M.J., Fielden, S.L., & Hoel, H. (2010). Reviewing Sexual Harassment in the Workplace – An Intervention Model. Retrieved from http: //dx.doi.org.ezproxy.liberty.edu/10.1108/00483481011064190
Jennifer L Levi + (2008). ARTICLE: Misapplying Equality Theories: Dress Codes at Work. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 19, 353. Retrieved from https://advance-lexis-com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/api/document?collection=analytical-materials&id=urn:contentItem:4S03-2H40-00CT-W07V-00000-00&context=1516831.
Klonoski, R. (2016). Defining Employee Benefits: A Managerial Perspective. Associate Professor of Business. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301622145_Defining_Employee_Benefits_A_Managerial_Perspective
Laundon, M., Cathcart, A., & Mcdonald, P. (2019). Just benefits? Employee benefits and organizational justice. Retrieved from https://www-emerald-com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ER-11-2017-0285/full/html
Mitchell, M. S., Koen, C. M., & Moore, T. W. (2013). Dress Codes and Appearance Policies. The Health Care Manager, 32(4), 294–302. Retrieved from https://ovidsp-dc2-ovid-com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/sp-4.02.1a/ovidweb.cgi?QS2=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
Pearce, L. (2014). From Hollywood to the health service: Sexual harassment at work. Vol. 32, Iss. 16-19. Retrieve from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/1992712288/fulltext/680EAFB42B014AF9PQ/1?accountid=12085
Shaw, E., Hegewisch, A., & Hess, C. (2018). Sexual Harassment and Assault at Work: Understanding the Cost. Retrieved from https://iwpr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/IWPR-sexual-harassment-brief_FINAL.pdf
U.S. Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/ovw/sexual-assault
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2018). Fact About Sexual Harassment. Retrieved from https://www.eeoc.gov/facts/fs-sex.html
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2019). Laws Enforced by EEOC. Retrieved from https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/index.cfm
Work Redefined: A New Age of Benefits. (2017). Retrieved from https://benefittrends.metlife.com/media/1382/2017-ebts-report_0320_exp0518_v2.pdf