Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin™
This assignment will be submitted to Turni
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin™
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.
Instructions
Select four artifacts/signature assignments that you would like to include in your e-portfolio. Explain how each one correlates to the learning objectives of the program as well as explain why you selected these specific documents to include in your e-portfolio.
Submission Instructions:
Submit your work as an MS Word in the assignment section
Word documents should be a minimum of 2 pages in length not including a cover/title page.
Double space your paper
Assignment is due Sunday by 11:59 EST
Due on Jul 14, 2024 11:59 PM
Attachments
M496.Program and Concentration Objectives.pdf (577.3 KB)
Download All Files
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: MGMT Portfolio Assignment Rubric
Print
Criteria
Exemplary
Accomplished
Developing
Beginning
Did not attempt
Criterion Score
Purpose
10 points
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of context, audience, and purpose that is responsive to the assigned task(s) and focuses all elements of the work.
8.5 points
Demonstrates adequate consideration of context, audience, and purpose and a clear focus on the assigned task(s) (e.g., the task aligns with audience, purpose, and context).
7.5 points
Demonstrates awareness of context, audience, purpose, and to the assigned tasks(s) (e.g., begins to show awareness of audience’s perceptions and assumptions).
6.5 points
Demonstrates minimal attention to context, audience, purpose, and to the assigned tasks(s) (e.g., expectation of instructor or self as audience).
0 points
Did not attempt.
Score of Purpose,
/ 10
Content Development
20 points
Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to illustrate mastery of the subject, conveying the writer’s understanding, and shaping the whole work.
17 points
Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to explore ideas within the context of the discipline and shape the whole work.
15 points
Uses appropriate and relevant content to develop and explore ideas through most of the work.
13 points
Uses appropriate and relevant content to develop simple ideas in some parts of the work.
0 points
Did not attempt.
Score of Content Development,
/ 20
Reflections
30 points
Reflects/critiques identify and describe growth from experiences both inside and outside of the classroom.
25.5 points
Most of the reflections or critiques identify and describe growth from experiences and learning both inside and outside of the classroom.
22.5 points
Reflections/critiques reveal some depth, with slightly broader perspectives but are not indicative of critical thought and reflection.
19.5 points
Reflections/critiques are unclear on growth from inside and outside of the classroom, are generally at the surface level without relating to a broader perspective to the items or outcomes for the program.
0 points
Did not attempt.
Score of Reflections,
/ 30
Organization
30 points
The writing flows smoothly and logically from a well-defined thesis. It contains an appropriate introduction, conclusion, smooth transitions and page count and assignment requirements.
25.5 points
The writing is organized logically and flows well.
An introduction and conclusion are evident, but transitions may be smoother. All or most of the assignment requirements are included.
22.5 points
The writing demonstrates rudimentary organization and logical structure, but ideas may be more fully developed and supported by more appropriate evidence.
19.5 points
The writing is noticeably lacking in organization.
There is no clear introduction nor conclusion and ideas are neither carefully nor fully developed. Supporting evidence is clearly lacking.
0 points
Did not attempt.
Score of Organization,
/ 30
Grammar and Mechanics
10 points
demonstrates almost perfect grammar and mechanics; no more than 1 major error (sentence fragment, run-on sentences comma splice); no more than 2 minor errors (typos, spelling, subject-verb agreement, punctuation, etc.
8.5 points
Writing demonstrates competent grammar and mechanics; no more than 2 major errors; no more than 4 minor errors.
7.5 points
Writing demonstrates inconsistent grammar and mechanics; no more than 3 major errors; no more than 5 minor errors.
6.5 points
Writing demonstrates inconsistent grammar and mechanics; no more than 3 major errors; no more than 5 minor errors.
0 points
Did not attempt.
Score of Grammar and Mechanics,
/ 10
Total
Score of MGMT Portfolio Assignment Rubric,
/ 100
Overall Score
Exemplary
90 points minimum
Accomplished
80 points minimum
Developing
70 points minimum
Beginning
60 points minimum
Did not attempt
0 points minimum
Submit Assignment
Files to submit
(0) file(s) to submit
After uploading, you must click Submit to complete the submission.
Add a FileRecord AudioRecord Video
Comments
Paragraph
Lato (Recommended)
19px (Default)
SubmitCancel
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.