Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

Background Information

This is a paper review conducted on one of the papers written by the students. It aims at looking at the content, organization, style, mastery, methods, applications and quality of the work, in order to gain an in-sight about the main aspects associated with the delivering leadership recognized in a particular project. Rules of grammar, punctuation, sentence structure, among other aspects of writing are looked into in this paper review.

The aim of origin paper

The paper that is being reviewed was a response to the question below:

What are the leadership styles and qualities most appropriate to complete projects and operational activities? To do this the following check list will be used.

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

Assessment  High/ Med/Low HML H/M/L
1 Content Is the content of the manuscript likely to be of interest to sophisticated managers or scholars interested in managing projects in business? If not, are there key parts missing or is the manuscript misaligned with what you believe is essential to this discipline? H
2 Organization Is the manuscript organized in clear and logical manner? If not, how can it be improved?
Checklist guide:
Introduction:
Explains the:
purpose of the paper
” scope and any relevant limitations
” context by providing the rationale of any case study examples
Theoretical Framework:
Includes:
” intelligent discussion of ALL required readings
” evidence of additional knowledge through further cited references
” concisely refers to relevant theory relating to the topic
Data/Evidence used in Case Study Examples
Includes:
” Explanation of the context of the source of data used (validity of observational data  if yours in what way is this of value? Explain
its context to your experience or others that you have drawn this
evidence or data from)
” Highlights any data/evidence characteristics (ie this may be
limited to a specific type of organisation e.g. an NGO or public sector organisation or a global business corporation etc.
” Highlights limitations (e.g. this may be an example in a rapidly
changing environment so things may have changed drastically
since this example was experienced)
Discussion and Evaluation of Data/Evidence Findings
This should compare the theory identified with the data and evidence presented. It should demonstrate that:
” Evidence or data is clearly and concisely presented
” Evidence or data is shown to be valid and credible (i.e. it is
convincing) and relevant to the argument
” Theory and observation of evidence is well matched (i.e. no
extraneous un-discussed data/evidence is introduced but not
commented upon or that theories/concepts are not introduced
that are not then used to compare with presented data/evidence)Conclusions
8 DPM
This should wrap up the paper and not introduce anything new. It should:
” Clearly and concisely summarize the purpose of the paper and how
it was fulfilled
” It should clearly and concisely summarize the main findings or
observations
” It should highlight just a few of the most salient and critical and
useful findings